Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2020)
Inquietud Empresarial 20(2) Julio–Diciembre 2020

MANAGEMENT, PRODUCTION AND SERVICE

Structuring and creating alternatives for the eggplant loss problem using the value-focused thinking methodology

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.11208

Published 2020-12-01

  • Elsa Verónica Larreta Ramírez
    • ,
  • Diego Alonso Gastelum Chavira
    • ,
  • Juan Carlos Leyva López
    • ,
  • Omar Ahumada Valenzuela

Elsa Verónica Larreta Ramírez
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Economic and Management Sciences Department. Blvd. Lola Beltrán s/n, 4 de Marzo, cp. 80054. Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico

Diego Alonso Gastelum Chavira
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Economic and Management Sciences Department. Blvd. Lola Beltrán s/n, 4 de Marzo, cp. 80054. Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico

Juan Carlos Leyva López
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Economic and Management Sciences Department. Blvd. Lola Beltrán s/n, 4 de Marzo, cp. 80054. Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico

Omar Ahumada Valenzuela
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Engineering Sciences Department. Blvd. Lola Beltrán s/n, 4 de Marzo, cp. 80054. Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico.

Abstract

The eggplant is a short shelf-life vegetable whose export in Mexico generates significant incomes for horticultural companies. However, when the market’s price is down, or its quality does not fulfill the market’s requirements, eggplant is not exported, and demand is low in the domestic market. This situation generates financial problems for companies, unemployment for people, and environmental problems, among others. To reduce eggplant loss is necessary to understand the elements around the issue, structure the problem, and generate solution alternatives. In this work, the Value-Focused Thinking (VFT) methodology was applied in a horticultural farm in Sinaloa, Mexico, to obtain values from a decision-maker to structure the eggplant loss problem, objectives of the farm and generate solution alternatives. This article presents a structured problem about eggplant loss, which includes one strategic objective, five fundamental objectives, and nine means-ends objectives as well as twenty-seven solution alternatives such as applying protected agriculture technology, selling waste as food for livestock and designing a new product based on eggplant. Through the results of the application of VFT methodology, the decision-maker had a better understanding of the eggplant loss problem and its value, which is going to be reflected in benefits for the horticultural farm.

Keywords: Eggplant loss, problem structuring, creating alternatives, value-focused thinking.

JEL classification: D46, D81

Received: 10/06/2020. Accepted: 06/11/2020.  Published: 01/12/2020

Keywords

Eggplant loss, problem structuring, creating alternatives, value-focused thinking

PDF

References

  1. Alencar, L. H., Mota, C. M. de M., & Alencar, M. H. (2011). The problem of disposing of plaster waste from building sites: Problem structuring based on value focus thinking methodology. Waste Management, 31(12), 2512–2521. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2011.06.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.06.015
  2. Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). The efficacy of SMARTER - simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking. Acta Psychologica, 93(1–3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8
  3. Beausang, C., Hall, C., & Toma, L. (2017). Food waste and losses in primary production: Qualitative insights from horticulture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 126(January), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.042
  4. CEC. (2017). Characterization and management of food loss and waste in North America. Retrieved from http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/11772-characterization-and-management-food-loss-and-waste-in-north-america-en.pdf
  5. CEC. (2019). Quantifying Food loss and waste and its impacts. Montreal, Quebec. Retrieved from http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/11813-technical-report-quantifying-food-loss-and-waste-and-its-impacts-en.pdf
  6. Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
  7. FAO. (2011). Global food losses and food waste – Extent, causes and prevention. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  8. Gallo, M., Naviglio, D., & Ferrara, L. (2014). Nasunin, an Antioxidant anthocyanin from eggplant peels, as natural dye to avoid food allergies and intolerances. European Scientific Journal, 10(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n9p%p
  9. Ghidelli, C., Mateos, M., Rojas-Argudo, C., & Pérez-Gago, M. B. (2014). Extending the shelf life of fresh-cut eggplant with a soy protein–cysteine based edible coating and modified atmosphere packaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 95, 81–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.04.007
  10. GSS. (2017). State development plan 2017-2021 (In Spanish). Retrieved from https://sinaloa.gob.mx/uploads/2017/06/plan-estatal-de-desarrollo-sinaloa-2017-2021.pdf
  11. Hodges, R. J., Buzby, J. C., & Bennett, B. (2011). Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(S1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000936
  12. INEGI. (2015). Intercensal survey 2015 - main results (In Spanish). Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/intercensal/2015/doc/eic_2015_presentacion.pdf
  13. ITC. (2019a). List of exporters for the selected product. Product: 07 Edible vegetables and certain roots and tubers. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.trademap.org/tradestat/Country_SelProduct_TS.aspx?nvpm=1%7C%7C%7C%7C%7C07%7C%7C%7C2%7C1%7C1%7C2%7C2%7C1%7C2%7C1%7C1
  14. ITC. (2019b). List of importing markets for the product exported by Mexico in 2018. Product: 070930 Fresh or chilled aubergines “eggplants.” Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.trademap.org/Country_SelProductCountry.aspx?nvpm=1%7C484%7C%7C%7C%7C070930%7C%7C%7C6%7C1%7C1%7C2%7C1%7C%7C2%7C1%7C1
  15. Karjalainen, T. P., Marttunen, M., Sarkki, S., & Rytkönen, A.-M. (2013). Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: An analytic–deliberative approach. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 40, 54–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001
  16. Keeney, G. L., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2010). Identifying and structuring the objectives of terrorists. Risk Analysis, 30(12), 1803–1816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01472.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01472.x
  17. Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision-making. London, England: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80025-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)80025-8
  18. Keeney, R. L. (2013). Identifying, prioritizing, and using multiple objectives. EURO J Decis Process, 1, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0002-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0002-9
  19. Kenney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
  20. Llave, Y., Takemori, K., Fukuoka, M., Takemori, T., Tomita, H., & Sakai, N. (2016). Mathematical modeling of shrinkage deformation in eggplant undergoing simultaneous heat and mass transfer during convection-oven roasting. Journal of Food Engineering, 178, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFOODENG.2016.01.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.013
  21. May, J., Dhillon, G., & Caldeira, M. (2013). Defining value-based objectives for ERP systems planning. Decis. Support Syst., 55(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.036
  22. Meyer, R. S., Bamshad, M., Fuller, D. Q., & Litt, A. (2014). Comparing medicinal uses of eggplant and related solanaceae in China, India, and the Philippines suggests the independent development of uses, cultural diffusion, and recent species substitutions. Economic Botany, 68(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-014-9267-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-014-9267-6
  23. Mustajoki, J., Saarikoski, H., Marttunen, M., Ahtikoski, A., Hallikainen, V., Helle, T., … Ylisirniö, A.-L. (2011). Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(6), 1550–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2011.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007
  24. Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J., Wright, N., & Ujang, Z. bin. (2014). The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.04.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020
  25. Principato, L., Ruini, L., Guidi, M., & Secondi, L. (2019). Adopting the circular economy approach on food loss and waste: The case of Italian pasta production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144(December 2018), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.025
  26. Redlingshöfer, B., Coudurier, B., & Georget, M. (2017). Quantifying food loss during primary production and processing in France. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.173
  27. Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas. Paris: Economica.
  28. SADER. (2019). Agri-Food Atlas 2012-2018. Retrieved from https://nube.siap.gob.mx/gobmx_publicaciones_siap/pag/2018/Atlas-Agroalimentario-2018
  29. Secretary of Economy. (2019). Tariff information system via internet. 0709.30 - Eggplants (In Spanish). Retrieved September 15, 2019, from http://www.economia-snci.gob.mx/
  30. Selart, M., & Johansen, S. T. (2011). Understanding the role of value-focused thinking in idea management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(3), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00602.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00602.x
  31. Sheng, H., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F.-H. (2010). Understanding the values of mobile technology in education: a value-focused thinking approach. SIGMIS Database, 41(2), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/1795377.1795380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1795377.1795380
  32. Siau, K., & Ling, M. (2017). Mobile collaboration support for virtual teams: the case of virtual information systems development teams. Journal of Database Management (JDM), 28(3), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2017070103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2017070103
  33. Siebert, J., & Keeney, R. L. (2015). Creating more and better alternatives for decisions using objectives. Operations Research, 63(5), 1144–1158. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1411
  34. Thyberg, K. L., & Tonjes, D. J. (2016). Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106, 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2015.11.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.016
  35. UN. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, Pub. L. No. A/RES/70/1 (2015). United Nations. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
  36. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behaviour. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  37. Wakiyama, T., Lenzen, M., Faturay, F., Geschke, A., Malik, A., Fry, J., & Nansai, K. (2019). Responsibility for food loss from a regional supply-chain perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146(April), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.003

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.