Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2020)
Inquietud Empresarial 20(2) Julio–Diciembre 2020

INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY

A theoretical model of knowledge transfer for Sinaloa companies

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.11496

Published 2020-12-01

  • Greysell Ramos Aguilar
    • ,
  • Beatriz Romero
    • ,
  • Rocio Payares

Greysell Ramos Aguilar
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Culiacán. Boulevard Lola Beltrán, Colonia 4 de Marzo, Culiacán, Sinaloa, México.

Beatriz Romero
Facultad de Contaduría y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Boulevard De las Américas y Universitarios sin número, Ciudad Universitaria Módulo IV. Culiacán, Sinaloa, México

Rocio Payares
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Unidad Culiacán. Boulevard Lola Beltrán sin número, Colonia 4 de Marzo, Culiacán, Sinaloa, México.

Abstract

The present documentary analysis of knowledge transfer models, intends to interpret the characteristics that identify the Knowledge Creation Spiral of Nonaka and Takeuchi; the E-flow of Pedler, Burgoyne and Boybell; the Szulanski Knowledge Transfer Process; as well as the Common Knowledge Strengthening Model of  Dixon, to determine the similarities and differences that characterize each one and that provide valuable information to generate a proposal of theoretical model of knowledge transfer, which facilitates studying this phenomenon in the Sinaloa companies.

Keywords: Management, knowledge, knowledge transfer, Sinaloa companies.

JEL Classification: M1, M10

Received: 22/07/2020.  Accepted: 05/11/2020.  Published: 01/12/2020.

Keywords

Management, knowledge, knowledge transfer, Sinaloa companies

PDF (Español)

References

  • Bennet, A. & Bennet, D. (2007). Knowledge mobilization in the social sciences and humanities. Moving from research to action. Estados Unidos: MQI Press.
  • Bernal, C., Frost, J. & Sierra, H. (2014). Importancia de la gerencia del conocimiento: contrastes entre la teoría y la evidencia empírica, Estudios Gerenciales, 30, 65-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.01.011
  • Bushe, G. (2009). Learning from collective experience: A differente view of organizational learning, OD Practitioner, 41(3), 19-23.
  • Consejo para el Desarrollo Económico de Sinaloa. (2019). PIB Sinaloa. Recuperado el 18 de junio de 2019 en http://sinaloaennumeros.com/estadistica-economica/
  • Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Daft, R. (2014). Teoría y diseño organizacional. México: Cengage Learning.
  • Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (2001). El conocimiento en acción. Cómo las organizaciones manejan lo que saben. Estados Unidos: Prentice Hall.
  • Ding, X., Liu, H. & Song, Y. (2013). Are internal knowledge transfer strategies double-edged swords?, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 69-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300769
  • Dixon, N. (2001). El conocimiento común, como prosperan las compañías que comparten lo que saben. Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldhaber, G. (1999). Comunicación organizacional. México: Diana.
  • Hart, Z. (2012). Message content and source during organizational socialization, Journal of Business Communication. 49 (3), 191-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612446731
  • King, W. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational learning, Annals of Information Systems, 4, 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_1
  • Lilleoere, A. & Holme, E. (2011). Knowledge-sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical research and development, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111108693
  • Luu, T. (2012). Behind knowledge transfer, Management Decision, 50(3), 459-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216232
  • Martinkenaite, I. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of inter-organizational knowledge transfer, Baltic Journal of Management, 6(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261111100888
  • McLaughlin, S. (2010). Six tenets for developing an effective knowledge transfer strategy, VINE: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 40(2), 153-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721011050668
  • Mukherjee, B., Mukherjee, A. & Bhatia, A. (2012). The role of business communication in knowledge management organization, Ninth AIMS International Conference of Management. Consultado el 06 de noviembre de 2012 en http://www.aims-international.org/aims9/aims9cd/pdf/P9106-Final.pdf
  • Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1999). La organización creadora de conocimiento. México: Oxford University Press.
  • O´Dell, C., Hubert, C. & American Productivity and Quality Center. (2011). The new edge in knowledge. How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. Estados Unidos: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4043/23620-MS
  • Payares, R., Ramos, G. & Romero, Beatriz. (2014). Cultura y tipología de la estructura organizacional en la empresa sinaloense en Alvarado, Aida; y López, Santo. (Coordinadores) Cultura e innovación social para el desarrollo de las regiones. México: Ediciones Del Lirio.
  • Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J. & Boybell, T. (1997). The learning Company, a strategy for sustainable development. Londres: McGrawHill.
  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press.
  • Perona, M., López, P. & Navas, J. (2009). La transferencia de conocimiento en la organización multiunidad: Un modelo integrado de análisis, Cuadernos de Estudios Empresariales. 19, 43-73.
  • Pillania, R. (2009). Demystifying knowledge management, Business Strategy Series, 10(2), 96-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17515630910942223
  • Rejeb-Khachlaf, N., Mezghani, L. & Quélin, B. (2011). Personal networks and knowledge transfer in inter-organizational networks, Journal of Small Business and Enterpise Development, 18(2), 278-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111127070
  • Rincón, R. (2017). Gestión del conocimiento y aprendizaje organizacional: una vision integral, Informes Psicológicos, 17(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18566/infpsic.v17n1a03
  • Rojas, R. & Torres, C. (2017). La gestión del conocimiento basado en la Teoría de Nonaka y Takeuchi, INNOVA Research Journal, 2(4), 30-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v2.n4.2017.147
  • Sarayreh, B., Mardawi, A. & Dmour, R. (2012). Comparative study: The Nonaka Model of Knowledge Management, International Journal of Enginneering and Advanced Technology, 1(6), 45-48.
  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17. (Winter special issues), 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
  • Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
  • Ty, M., Walsh, J. & Anurit, P. (2010). An empirical assesment of the relationship between national culture and learning capability in organisations in Cambodia, International Business Research, 3(4), 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v3n4p81
  • Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J., Van Den Bosh, Frans. & Volberda, B. (2011). How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: a study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units, Technology Analysis & Strategic, 24(9), 929-950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.718666
  • Wilkesmann, M. & Wilkesmann, U. (2011). Knowledge transfer as interaction between experts and novices supported by technology, Vine: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 41(2), 96-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721111134763
  • Wolfe, C. & Loraas, T. (2008). Knowledge sharing: The effects of incentives, environment, and person, Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 53-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2008.22.2.53

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.