Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

A theoretical model of knowledge transfer for Sinaloa companies

Abstract

The present documentary analysis of knowledge transfer models, intends to interpret the characteristics that identify the Knowledge Creation Spiral of Nonaka and Takeuchi; the E-flow of Pedler, Burgoyne and Boybell; the Szulanski Knowledge Transfer Process; as well as the Common Knowledge Strengthening Model of  Dixon, to determine the similarities and differences that characterize each one and that provide valuable information to generate a proposal of theoretical model of knowledge transfer, which facilitates studying this phenomenon in the Sinaloa companies.

Keywords: Management, knowledge, knowledge transfer, Sinaloa companies.

JEL Classification: M1, M10

Received: 22/07/2020.  Accepted: 05/11/2020.  Published: 01/12/2020.

Keywords

Management, knowledge, knowledge transfer, Sinaloa companies

PDF (Español)

References

  1. Bennet, A. & Bennet, D. (2007). Knowledge mobilization in the social sciences and humanities. Moving from research to action. Estados Unidos: MQI Press.
  2. Bernal, C., Frost, J. & Sierra, H. (2014). Importancia de la gerencia del conocimiento: contrastes entre la teoría y la evidencia empírica, Estudios Gerenciales, 30, 65-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.01.011
  3. Bushe, G. (2009). Learning from collective experience: A differente view of organizational learning, OD Practitioner, 41(3), 19-23.
  4. Consejo para el Desarrollo Económico de Sinaloa. (2019). PIB Sinaloa. Recuperado el 18 de junio de 2019 en http://sinaloaennumeros.com/estadistica-economica/
  5. Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  6. Daft, R. (2014). Teoría y diseño organizacional. México: Cengage Learning.
  7. Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (2001). El conocimiento en acción. Cómo las organizaciones manejan lo que saben. Estados Unidos: Prentice Hall.
  8. Ding, X., Liu, H. & Song, Y. (2013). Are internal knowledge transfer strategies double-edged swords?, Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 69-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300769
  9. Dixon, N. (2001). El conocimiento común, como prosperan las compañías que comparten lo que saben. Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press.
  10. Goldhaber, G. (1999). Comunicación organizacional. México: Diana.
  11. Hart, Z. (2012). Message content and source during organizational socialization, Journal of Business Communication. 49 (3), 191-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612446731
  12. King, W. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational learning, Annals of Information Systems, 4, 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_1
  13. Lilleoere, A. & Holme, E. (2011). Knowledge-sharing enablers and barriers in pharmaceutical research and development, Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111108693
  14. Luu, T. (2012). Behind knowledge transfer, Management Decision, 50(3), 459-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216232
  15. Martinkenaite, I. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of inter-organizational knowledge transfer, Baltic Journal of Management, 6(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261111100888
  16. McLaughlin, S. (2010). Six tenets for developing an effective knowledge transfer strategy, VINE: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 40(2), 153-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721011050668
  17. Mukherjee, B., Mukherjee, A. & Bhatia, A. (2012). The role of business communication in knowledge management organization, Ninth AIMS International Conference of Management. Consultado el 06 de noviembre de 2012 en http://www.aims-international.org/aims9/aims9cd/pdf/P9106-Final.pdf
  18. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1999). La organización creadora de conocimiento. México: Oxford University Press.
  19. O´Dell, C., Hubert, C. & American Productivity and Quality Center. (2011). The new edge in knowledge. How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. Estados Unidos: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4043/23620-MS
  20. Payares, R., Ramos, G. & Romero, Beatriz. (2014). Cultura y tipología de la estructura organizacional en la empresa sinaloense en Alvarado, Aida; y López, Santo. (Coordinadores) Cultura e innovación social para el desarrollo de las regiones. México: Ediciones Del Lirio.
  21. Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J. & Boybell, T. (1997). The learning Company, a strategy for sustainable development. Londres: McGrawHill.
  22. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press.
  23. Perona, M., López, P. & Navas, J. (2009). La transferencia de conocimiento en la organización multiunidad: Un modelo integrado de análisis, Cuadernos de Estudios Empresariales. 19, 43-73.
  24. Pillania, R. (2009). Demystifying knowledge management, Business Strategy Series, 10(2), 96-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17515630910942223
  25. Rejeb-Khachlaf, N., Mezghani, L. & Quélin, B. (2011). Personal networks and knowledge transfer in inter-organizational networks, Journal of Small Business and Enterpise Development, 18(2), 278-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001111127070
  26. Rincón, R. (2017). Gestión del conocimiento y aprendizaje organizacional: una vision integral, Informes Psicológicos, 17(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18566/infpsic.v17n1a03
  27. Rojas, R. & Torres, C. (2017). La gestión del conocimiento basado en la Teoría de Nonaka y Takeuchi, INNOVA Research Journal, 2(4), 30-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v2.n4.2017.147
  28. Sarayreh, B., Mardawi, A. & Dmour, R. (2012). Comparative study: The Nonaka Model of Knowledge Management, International Journal of Enginneering and Advanced Technology, 1(6), 45-48.
  29. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17. (Winter special issues), 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
  30. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2884
  31. Ty, M., Walsh, J. & Anurit, P. (2010). An empirical assesment of the relationship between national culture and learning capability in organisations in Cambodia, International Business Research, 3(4), 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v3n4p81
  32. Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J., Van Den Bosh, Frans. & Volberda, B. (2011). How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: a study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units, Technology Analysis & Strategic, 24(9), 929-950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.718666
  33. Wilkesmann, M. & Wilkesmann, U. (2011). Knowledge transfer as interaction between experts and novices supported by technology, Vine: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 41(2), 96-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721111134763
  34. Wolfe, C. & Loraas, T. (2008). Knowledge sharing: The effects of incentives, environment, and person, Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 53-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2008.22.2.53

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.