Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2023)
Julio-Diciembre

Artículos

Dimensiones de análisis de los Estándares Voluntarios de Sostenibilidad en el comercio internacional agroindustrial

https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v13.n2.2023.16830

Publicado 2023-08-15

  • Diego Alonso García-Bonilla
    • ,
  • Edgar Guillermo Rodríguez-Guevara
    • ,
  • Diana Lorena Pineda-Ospina

Diego Alonso García-Bonilla
Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali, Colombia

Edgar Guillermo Rodríguez-Guevara
Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali, Colombia

Diana Lorena Pineda-Ospina
Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali, Colombia

Resumen

El artículo tiene como objetivo identificar las principales dimensiones de análisis en los Estándares Voluntarios de Sostenibilidad (EVS) en el comercio internacional de bienes agroindustriales. Para ello, se realizó un diseño mixto donde, a través de técnicas cuantitativas, se identificó la estructura conceptual del campo entre 2002 y 2020. A partir de los resultados se configuró un corpus de 263 documentos científicos y se realizó el procesamiento de indicadores en el software SciMAT. Desde lo cualitativo, se desarrolló un ejercicio de análisis de contenido que permitió la identificación de cinco dimensiones analíticas centrales: de aproximación teórica; de promotor del comercio internacional de alimentos; de incentivo para la producción de biomasa y productos forestales; de estímulo al comercio justo y de limitantes de los EVS. Entre los principales resultados, se destaca una tendencia creciente en la aplicación de los EVS como forma de gobierno privado y las limitaciones en su implementación.

Palabras clave

agroindustria, comercio internacional;, estándares, sostenibilidad

PDF XML

Biografía del autor/a

Diego Alonso García-Bonilla

Economista, Magíster en Administración de Empresas

Edgar Guillermo Rodríguez-Guevara

Economista, Magíster en Ingeniería Industrial

Diana Lorena Pineda-Ospina

Economista, Doctora en Sociología

Citas

  1. Abbott, K. W. (2012). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88(3), 543-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01088.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01088.x
  2. Anderson, M. (2018). Fair trade and consumer social responsibility: Exploring consumer citizenship as a driver of social and environmental change. Management Decision, 56 (3), 634-651. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0013
  3. Ascui, F., Farmery, A. K., & Gale, F. (2020). Comparing sustainability claims with assurance in organic agriculture standards. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 27 (1), 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2019.1682078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2019.1682078
  4. Bernzen, A. (2013). Sustainable standards? How organic standards in the EU and Australia affect local and global agrifood production and value chains. Food security in Australia: Challenges and Prospects for the Future (pp. 281-296). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4484-8_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4484-8_19
  5. Brandi, C. A. (2016). Sustainability Standards and Sustainable Development - Synergies and Trade-Offs of Transnational Governance. Sustainable Development, 25(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1639
  6. Byerlee, D., & Rueda, X. (2015). From public to private standards for tropical commodities: A century of global discourse on land governance on the forest frontier. Forests, 6 (4), 1301-1324. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6041301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f6041301
  7. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22 (1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02019280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
  8. Corvaglia, M. A. (2016). Public procurement and private standards: Ensuring sustainability under the WTO agreement on government procurement. Journal of International Economic Law, 19 (3), 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgw053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgw053
  9. DeFries, R. S., Fanzo, J., Mondal, P., Remans, R. & Wood, S. A. (2017) Is voluntary certification of tropical agricultural commodities achieving sustainability goals for small-scale producers? A review of the evidence. Environmental Research Letters, 12 (3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa625e DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa625e
  10. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62 (1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  11. Garrett, R. D. et al. (2019). Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments. Global Environmental Change, 54, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.003
  12. Goetz, A. (2013). Private governance and land grabbing: The equator principles and the roundtable on sustainable biofuels. Globalizations, 10 (1), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.760949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.760949
  13. Green, J. F. (2013). Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691157580.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691157580.001.0001
  14. Henders, S., Persson, U. M., & Kastner, T. (2015). Trading forests: Land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environmental Research Letters, 10 (12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125012
  15. Lamers, P., Mai-Moulin, T., & Junginger, M. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for international trade in forest biomass. Mobilization of forest bioenergy in the boreal and temperate biomes: Challenges, opportunities and case studies, 127-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804514-5.00008-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804514-5.00008-1
  16. Latynskiy, E., & Berger, T. (2017). Assessing the income effects of group certification for smallholder coffee farmers: Agent-based simulation in Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12212
  17. Le Polain-De Waroux, Y., Garrett, R. D., Heilmayr, R., & Lambin, E. F. (2016). Land-use policies and corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (15), 4021-4026. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602646113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602646113
  18. Loconto, A., & Santacoloma, P. (2014) Lessons learned from field projects on voluntary standards: synthesis of results. En R. Wang (Assistant Director-General). Workshop: Voluntary Standards for Sustainable Food Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. Workshop executed in Rome, Italy.
  19. MacGregor, F., Ramasar, V., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). Problems with firm-led voluntary sustainability schemes: The case of direct trade coffee. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040651
  20. Marx, A., Sharma, A., & Becault, E. (2015). Voluntary Sustainability Standards: An Overview. Acropolis Report, Klimos. https://ees.kuleuven.be/klimos/papers/marx_2015_voluntary_sustainability_standards.pd
  21. Marx, A., Brando, N., & Lein, B. (2017). Strengthening labour rights provisions in bilateral trade agreements: Making the case for voluntary sustainability standards. Global Policy, 8, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12397
  22. Milder, J. C. et al. (2015). An agenda for assessing and improving conservation impacts of sustainability standards in tropical agriculture. Conservation Biology, 29 (2), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12411
  23. Millard, E. (2011). Incorporating agroforestry approaches into commodity value chains. Environmental Management, 48 (2), 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9685-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9685-5
  24. Minten, B., Dereje, M., Engida, E., & Tamru, S. (2018). Tracking the quality premium of certified coffee: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 101, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.010
  25. Moser, C., Hildebrandt, T., & Bailis, R. (2014). International sustainability standards and certification. Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean, 27-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9275-7_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9275-7_2
  26. Naegele, H. (2020). Where does the Fair Trade money go? How much consumers pay extra for Fair Trade coffee and how this value is split along the value chain. World Development, 133, 105006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105006
  27. Partzsch, L., & Kemper, L. (2019). Cotton certification in Ethiopia: Can an increasing demand for certified textiles create a ‘fashion revolution’? Geoforum, 99, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.017
  28. Plassmann, K. (2018). Comparing voluntary sustainability initiatives and product carbon footprinting in the food sector, with a particular focus on environmental impacts and developing countries. Development Policy Review, 36 (4), 503-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12293
  29. Ponte, S. (2014). 'Roundtabling' sustainability: Lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum, 54, 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.008
  30. Raynolds, L. T. (2012). Fair trade flowers: Global certification, environmental sustainability, and labor standards. Rural Sociology, 77 (4), 493-519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00090.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00090.x
  31. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33 (5-6), 791-814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443629
  32. Ruben, R., & Zuniga, G. (2011). How standards compete: Comparative impact of coffee certification schemes in northern Nicaragua. Supply Chain Management, 16 (2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111115356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111115356
  33. Sellare, J., Meemken, E. M., & Qaim, M. (2020). Fairtrade, agrochemical input use, and effects on human health and the environment. Ecological Economics, 176, 106718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106718
  34. Steinrücken, T., & Jaenichen, S. (2007). The fair trade idea: Towards an economics of social labels. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30 (3), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-007-9034-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-007-9034-5
  35. Surmeier, A. (2020). Dynamic capability building and social upgrading in tourism-Potentials and limits of sustainability standards. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28 (10), 1498-1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1744615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1744615
  36. Tayleur, C. et al. (2017). Global coverage of agricultural sustainability standards, and their role in conserving biodiversity. Conservation Letters, 10(5), 610-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12314
  37. Tscharntke, T., Milder, J. C., Schroth, G., Clough, Y., Declerck, F., Waldron, A., Rice, R., & Ghazoul, J. (2015) Conserving Biodiversity Through Certification of Tropical Agroforestry Crops at Local and Landscape Scales. Conservation Letters, 8 (1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12110
  38. United Nations Forum on Sustainability Standards (2013). 1st Flagship Report of the United Nations Forum on Sustainability Standards. https://unfss.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/unfss-report-issues-1_draft_lores.pdf
  39. Van Heeswijk, L., & Turnhout, E. (2013). The discursive structure of FLEGT (forest law enforcement, governance and trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 32, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.009
  40. Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Dengerink, J. D. (2016). Impacts of private sustainability certification on practices of tea production in tamilnadu, India. International Journal of Business and Globalization, 17 (1), 45-82. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2016.077567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2016.077567
  41. Vifell, A. C., & Thedvall, R. (2012). Organizing for social sustainability: Governance through bureaucratization in meta-organizations. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8 (1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908084
  42. Wagner, M. (2020). Global governance in new public environmental management: An international and intertemporal comparison of voluntary standards' impacts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29 (3), 1056-1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2417
  43. Welford, R., Meaton, J., & Young, W. (2003). Fair trade as a strategy for international competitiveness. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 10 (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500309469781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500309469781

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

Artículos similares

1 2 3 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.