Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2020)
Inquietud Empresarial 20(2) Julio–Diciembre 2020

INNOVACIÓN Y TECNOLOGÍA

Modelo de articulación productiva como sistema regional de innovación.

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.11337

Publicado 01-12-2020

  • Denisse Ballardo-Cárdenas
    • ,
  • Pedro L. López-de Alba
    • ,
  • Ernesto León-Castro
    • ,
  • Ramón Martínez-Huerta

Denisse Ballardo-Cárdenas
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Blvd. Lola Beltrán and Blvd. Rolando Arjona, 4 de marzo, Z.C. 80020 Culiacán Rosales, Sinaloa, México

Pedro L. López-de Alba
Universidad de la Salle Bajio, Av Universidad 602 Lomas del Campestre C.P. #37150 León, Guanajuato, México

Ernesto León-Castro
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, AV. Alonso de Ribera 2850, 4030000 Concepción, Chile

Ramón Martínez-Huerta
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Address: Blvd. Lola Beltrán and Blvd. Rolando Arjona, 4 de marzo, Z.C. 80020 Culiacán Rosales, Sinaloa, México

Resumen

Este documento presenta un modelo de articulación productivo que sirve de base para desarrollar y mejorar los sistemas regionales de innovación. El objetivo principal es generar un proceso de vinculación entre el sector industrial, la academia y el gobierno dentro del cual se puedan resolver problemas regionales específicos mediante la intervención efectiva de cada uno de los actores. Además del proceso, se presenta una historia de éxito del Estado de Guanajuato, México, que sirve para visualizar como un proceso claro y definido de articulación que permite una transferencia de conocimiento entre los actores.

Palabras clave: Modelo de articulación de productividad; sistema regional de innovación; triple hélice.

Códigos JEL: L38, O18

Recibido: 30/06/2020. Aceptado: 05/11/2020.  Publicado: 01/12/2020

Palabras clave

Modelo de articulación de productividad, Triple hélice, sistema regional de innovacion

PDF (English)

Citas

  1. Alfaro-Calderón G.G., Zaragoza A., Alfaro-García V.G., Gil-Lafuente A.M. (2020) Innovation Capabilities and Innovation Systems: A Forgotten Effects Analysis of Their Components. In: Ferrer-Comalat J., Linares-Mustarós S., Merigó J., Kacprzyk J. (eds) Modelling and Simulation in Management Sciences. MS-18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 894. Springer, Cham DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15413-4_5
  2. Alfaro-García V.G., Gil-Lafuente A.M., Alfaro Calderón G.G. (2018) Innovation Capabilities Using Fuzzy Logic Systems. In: Gil-Lafuente A., Merigó J., Dass B., Verma R. (eds) Applied Mathematics and Computational Intelligence. FIM 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 730. Springer, Cham DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75792-6_20
  3. Alfaro-Garcia, V. (2019). Toma de decisiones en la incertidumbre: técnicas y herramientas ante escenarios altamente desafiantes. Inquietud Empresarial, 19(2), I-III. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.11034
  4. Alfaro-García, V.G., Gil-Lafuente, A.M. and Alfaro Calderón, G.G. (2017), "A fuzzy methodology for innovation management measurement", Kybernetes, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 50-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2016-0153
  5. Anne-Mette Hjalager (2010) Regional Innovation Systems: The Case of Angling Tourism, Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 12:2, 192-216, DOI: 10.1080/14616681003725201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616681003725201
  6. Asheim, B. (2012). The changing role of learning regions in the globalizing knowledge economy: A theoretical re-examination. Regional Studies, 46(8), 993-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.607805
  7. Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011
  8. Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional studies, 45(7), 893-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
  9. Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past–present–future. In Handbook on the geographies of innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710774.00010
  10. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of industrial organization, 11(2), 253-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157670
  11. Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European planning studies, 6(2), 131-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319808720451
  12. Baez-Palencia, D., Olazabal-Lugo, M., & Romero-Muñoz, J. (2019). Toma de decisiones empresariales a través de la media ponderada ordenada. Inquietud Empresarial, 19(2), 11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.9843
  13. Berman, A., Marino, A., & Mudambi, R. (2020). The global connectivity of regional innovation systems in Italy: a core–periphery perspective. Regional Studies, 54(5), 677-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1672865
  14. Blanco-Mesa, F., León-Castro, E., & Merigó, J. M. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of aggregation operators. Applied Soft Computing, 81 (4), 105488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105488
  15. Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(8), 1513-1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
  16. Braczyk, H. J., & Cooke, P. P., and Heidenreich, M.(eds). 1998. Regional Innovation Systems. The role of governances in a globalized world, London/Bristol.
  17. Bunnell, T. G., & Coe, N. M. (2001). Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human geography, 25(4), 569-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688940
  18. Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation networks: spatial perspectives. Belhaven-Pinter.
  19. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research policy, 31(2), 233-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
  20. Chen, K. and Guan, J. (2011) ‘Mapping the functionality of China’s regional innovation systems: a structural approach’, China Econ. Rev., Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.11–27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.08.002
  21. Clò, S., Florio, M., Pellegrin, J. and Sirtori, E. (2018) ‘How do research intensive systems emerge in less developed areas? The case of mechatronics in the Italian southern region Apulia’, Int. J. Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2018.091799
  22. Coenen, L., & Moodysson, J. (2009). Putting constructed regional advantage into Swedish practice. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 587-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802682180
  23. Coletti, M., & Maria, E. D. (2015). The rush for cluster initiatives: cluster organisation and management in Central Europe. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 19(5-6), 327-342.
  24. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
  25. Cooke, P. (2004). Evolution of regional innovation systems–emergence, theory, challenge for action. Regional innovation systems, 2, 1-18.
  26. Cooke, P. N., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: regional perspectives on global competitiveness. Cengage Learning EMEA.
  27. Cooke, P. N., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Regional Innovation Systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. Psychology Press.
  28. Dantas, E. and Bell, M. (2009) ‘Latecomer firms and the emergence and development of knowledge networks: the case of Petrobras in Brazil’, Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp.829–844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.007
  29. Dhewanto, W., Lantu, D. C., Herliana, S., & Permatasari, A. (2016). The obstacles for science technology parks in a developing country. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 8(1), 4-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2016.075180
  30. Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in society, 24(3), 243-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
  31. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and challenges for future research. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133-154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
  32. Doloreux, D., & Porto Gomez, I. (2017). A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 371-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1244516
  33. Edquist, C. (2001, June). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art. In DRUID conference, Aalborg (pp. 12-15).
  34. Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Psychology Press.
  35. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
  36. Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x
  37. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  38. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of Universityindustry-Government Relations. London: Cassell Academic.
  39. Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V., & Silvani, A. (2002). Looking for regional systems of innovation: evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Regional studies, 36(2), 173-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220121963
  40. Fornahl, D., & Brenner, T. (2003). Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035304752
  41. Fu, L., & Jiang, X. (2019). Does the multiple-participant innovation improve regional innovation efficiency? A study of China’s regional innovation systems. Sustainability, 11(17), 4658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174658
  42. Guimon, J. (2017). Policies to promote science-industry links and technology commercialisation in emerging countries: the case of Kazakhstan's Technology Commercialization Project. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 9(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2017.10003729
  43. Howells, J. R. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban studies, 39(5-6), 871-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220128354
  44. Iammarino, S. (2005). An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European planning studies, 13(4), 497-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500107084
  45. Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
  46. Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In New Avenues for regional innovation systems-Theoretical Advances, empirical cases and policy Lessons (pp. 221-238). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_11
  47. Kaufmann, A., & Aluja, J. G. (1988). Modelos para la investigación de efectos olvidados. Milladoiro.
  48. Kwon, S., & Motohashi, K. (2017). How institutional arrangements in the national innovation system affect industrial competitiveness: A study of Japan and the U.S. with multiagent simulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 221-235. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.005
  49. Landabaso, M., & Mouton, B. (2002). Towards a new regional innovation policy: 8 years of European experience through innovative actions. European Commission–DG regional Policy.–2002.–June.–36 p.
  50. León-Castro, E. (2019). El desarrollo de las pequeñas y medianas empresas: Una formación de las aulas hacia la internacionalización. Inquietud Empresarial, 19(1), I-IV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.10923
  51. Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research policy, 29(2), 243-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
  52. Li, M., He, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019). The triple helix system and regional entrepreneurship in China. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-23.
  53. Makkonen, T., Williams, A. M., Weidenfeld, A., & Kaisto, V. (2018). Cross-border knowledge transfer and innovation in the European neighbourhood: Tourism cooperation at the Finnish-Russian border. Tourism management, 68, 140-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.008
  54. Mason, C., Castleman, T., & Parker, C. (2005, January). Can knowledge management save regional development?. In Proceedings of the CRIC Cluster Conference: Beyond clusters: Current Practices & Future Strategies Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-15). University of Ballarat, Centre for Regional Innovation and Competitiveness.
  55. Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research policy, 35(10), 1499-1508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023
  56. Mytelka, L. K. (2000). Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy. Industry and innovation, 7(1), 15-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713670244
  57. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  58. Oinas, P., & Malecki, E. J. (1999). Spatial innovation systems. Making connections: Technological learning and regional economic change, 7-33.
  59. Oinas, P., & Malecki, E. J. (2002). The evolution of technologies in time and space: from national and regional to spatial innovation systems. International regional science review, 25(1), 102-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016001702762039402
  60. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Managing national innovation systems. OECD Publishing.
  61. Riahi, P., & Fard, H. D. (2019). Science, Technology and Innovation Policies to Strengthen Regional Innovation Systems. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 11(2), 193–208.
  62. Sleuwaegen, L., & Boiardi, P. (2014). Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions. Research Policy, 43(9), 1508-1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.014
  63. Avil´es-Sacoto, S. V., Cook , W. D., Güemes-Castorena,D., & Zhu, J. (2020). Modelling Efficiency in Regional Innovation Systems: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Problem with Shared Outputs within Groups of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.052
  64. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
  65. Wang, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2012). Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation — A theoretical analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 419-428. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.009
  66. Wolfe, D. A., & Gertler, M. S. (2006). Local antecedents and trigger events: Policy implications of path dependence for cluster formation. Cluster genesis: Technology-based industrial development, 243-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207183.003.0012

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.