Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé

IA nas Artes: Uma Análise Crítica das Comunidades Criativas e os Efeitos da Tecnologia na Produção Artística. (Versão pré-impressa)

Resumo

Este artigo explora a intersecção entre a inteligência artificial (IA) e a arte contemporânea, analisando a forma como a IA redefine a criatividade, a autoria e as dinâmicas sociais na produção artística, bem como as suas implicações éticas e estéticas. É feita uma revisão crítica da literatura sobre a incorporação da IA na arte, abordando três níveis de análise: a comunidade técnica, o mundo da arte e as ciências cognitivas, de modo a compreender as suas interações e efeitos na criatividade.  O estudo identifica tensões entre a criatividade humana e a criatividade gerada por máquinas, destacando como a IA pode democratizar o acesso a ferramentas artísticas, mas também levanta desafios sobre a autenticidade e o valor da arte produzida por humanos versus máquinas. O estudo conclui que a colaboração homem-máquina pode enriquecer o campo artístico, mas é essencial incluir diversas vozes no desenvolvimento da IA para mitigar preconceitos e redefinir conceitos de criatividade e autoria num contexto pós-humanista.

Palavras-chave

Arte, Inteligência Artificial, Criatividade, Pós-humanismo, Autenticidade

PDF (Español)

Biografia do Autor

Hector Alonso Martínez

Professor associado do Departamento de Métodos de Pesquisa e Diagnóstico em Educação, Faculdade de Educação, Universidad de Barcelona.

Mauro Jarquín-Ramírez

Professor da Faculdade de Filosofia e Letras da Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Enrique Javier Díez-Gutiérrez

Professor da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de León


Referências

  1. Anadol, Refik. "Machine hallucination." Photo courtesy of Refik Anadol Studio (2019). https://refikanadol.com/portfolio/machine-hallucinations/.
  2. Auslander, Philip. Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. Routledge, 2022.
  3. Benjamin, Walter. La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica (1936). en Discursos interrumpidos I, Frankfurt: Taurus. 1987. 17-60
  4. Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. Penguin Books, 1972.
  5. Bloom, Harold. The western canon: The books and school of the ages. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014.
  6. Boden, Margaret A. AI: Its Nature and Future. Oxford University Press, 2016.
  7. Bourgeois-Bougrine, Sophie, et al. "The Creativity Maze: Exploring Creativity in Screenplay Writing." Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 8, no. 4, 2014, pp. 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037839.
  8. Braidotti, Rosi. "Critical Posthuman Knowledges." South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 116, no. 1, 2017, pp. 83-96.
  9. Brewer, P.R., Cuddy, L., Dawson, W. et al. “Artists or art thieves? media use, media messages, and public opinion about artificial intelligence image generators”. AI & Soc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01854-3
  10. Buolamwini, Joy, and Timnit Gebru. "Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification." Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 2018, pp. 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278728.
  11. Carpo, Mario. “The second digital turn: design beyond intelligence”. MIT press, 2017.
  12. Chalmers, David J. "Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness." Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, 1995, pp. 200-219.
  13. Chen, Y. "Designing the Future: A Case Study on Human-AI Co-Innovation." Creative Education, vol. 15, no. 3, 2024, pp. 345-359. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.153028.
  14. Chibuzo, C. "Artificial Intelligence and Creativity: Is AI Really Creative?" Nigerian Journal of Arts and Humanities (NJAH), vol. 4, no. 1, 2024, pp. 1-15.
  15. Cook, Nicholas. Beyond the Score: Music as Performance. Oxford University Press, 2013.
  16. Danto, Arthur C. The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Harvard University Press, 1981.
  17. Dewey-Hagborg, Heather. "Stranger Visions." C Magazine 120 (2014).
  18. Díaz-Noci, Javier. "¿ Fusión o plagio? La importancia de la originalidad y el derecho de transformación de la obra en la producción informativa mediante IA." Hipertext. net 26 (2023): 69-76.
  19. Elgammal, A., et al. "CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating 'Art' by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms." arXiv Preprint arXiv:1706.07068, 2017, https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068.
  20. García-Peñalvo, Francisco José. Revisiones y Mapeos Sistemáticos de Literatura. Grupo GRIAL, 2019.
  21. Gatys, Leon A., et al. "Image Style Transfer Using Convolutional Neural Networks." Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, pp. 2414-2423.
  22. Gershenfeld, Neil. "How to Make Almost Anything: The Digital Fabrication Revolution." Foreign Affairs, vol. 91, no. 6, 2012, pp. 43-57.
  23. Goel, A. K., and J. C. Kaufman. "The Role of Cognitive Architecture in the Creative Process." The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 2016, pp. 275-291. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Grossmann, G. Ulrich. "El aura de la obra de arte y la desaparición del original." Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas. Vol. 34. No. 100. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 2012.
  25. Haraway, Donna J. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, 1991.
  26. Harrington, Ryan. "How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy Jenny Odell Melville House, Apr. $24 hardcover." Publishers Weekly 266.2 (2019): 42A-42A.
  27. Jarquín-Ramírez, Mauro Rafael, Héctor Alonso-Martínez, and Enrique Díez-Gutiérrez. "Alcances y límites educativos de la ia: control e ideología en el uso de Chatgpt." DIDAC 84 (2024): 84-102.
  28. Lacalle, José María, Marta Peirano, and Jordi Pérez Colomé. "La nueva censura digital: del algoritmo a la inteligencia artificial: conversación." Minerva: Revista del Círculo de Bellas Artes 37 (2022): 77-81.
  29. Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, 2005.
  30. Lem, Stanisław. Vacío Perfecto. Impedimenta, 2013.
  31. Lippard, Lucy. The Lure of the Local: Senses of Place in a Multicentered Society. The New Press, 1997.
  32. Manovich, Lev. AI Aesthetics. Strelka Press, 2018.
  33. McCormack, Jon, Toby Gifford, and Patrick Hutchings. "Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art." International conference on computational intelligence in music, sound, art and design (part of EvoStar). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019.
  34. Messer, Uwe. "Co-creating art with generative artificial intelligence: Implications for artworks and artists." Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2.1 (2024): 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100056.
  35. Mikalonytė, G., and M. Kneer. "Can Artificial Intelligence Make Art?" SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3827314.
  36. Mordvintsev, Alexander, Christopher Olah, and Mike Tyka. "Inceptionism: Going deeper into neural networks." Google research blog 20.14 (2015): 5. https://research.googleblog.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html.
  37. Ortiz-Arroba, Francisco. "La inteligencia artificial y la transformación de las expresiones artísticas." Uru: Revista de Comunicación y Cultura 10 (2024): 65-84.
  38. Paesano, G. "Artificial Intelligence and Creative Activities Inside Organizational Behavior." International Journal of Organizational Analysis, vol. 29, no. 4, 2021, pp. 1035-1050. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-09-2020-2421.
  39. Paglen, Trevor. "ImageNet Roulette." *Trevor Paglen*, 2021, https://paglen.com/project/imagenet-roulette/.
  40. Paglen, Trevor. "Invisible Images: Your Pictures Are Looking at You." Architectural Design, vol. 89, no. 1, 2019, pp. 22-27.
  41. Phelan, Peggy. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. Routledge, 1993.
  42. Sabrina, Belén Paola. "Arte y conocimiento. La dimensión epistémica del proceso artístico en la contemporaneidad." Revista humanidades. Vol 9.2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15517/h.v9i2.37126.
  43. Savage, Luke "La Reproducción No es Creatividad y la Inteligencia Artificial No es Arte." Jacobin Revista, 22 June 2023, https://jacobinlat.com/2023/06/22/la-reproduccion-no-es-creatividad-y-la-ia-no-es-arte/.
  44. Scruton, Roger. An intelligent person's guide to philosophy. Penguin, 1999.
  45. Searle, John R. "Minds, Brains, and Programs." Behavioral and Brain Sciences vol. 3, no. 3, 1980, pp. 417-457.
  46. Sontag, Susan. On Photography. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1978.
  47. Steyerl, Hito. "How Not to Be Seen: A Fucking Didactic Educational .MOV File." Hito Steyerl, 2017, https://www.hito-steyerl.de/.
  48. Tegmark, Max. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Vintage, 2018.
  49. Vinchon, Florent, et al. "Artificial Intelligence & Creativity: A manifesto for collaboration." The Journal of Creative Behavior 57.4 (2023): 472-484, https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.597.
  50. Wilson, Edward O. The Origins of Creativity. W. W. Norton & Company, 2017.
  51. Yepes, R. M. "Artificial Intelligence, Racialization, and Art Resistance." Cuadernos de Música, Artes Visuales y Artes Escénicas, vol. 19, no. 1, 2024, pp. 222-235.
  52. Zhou, Eric, and Dokyun Lee. "Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art." PNAS nexus 3.3 (2024): 052. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052.
  53. Zuboff, Shoshana. "Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action." New labor forum. Vol. 28. No. 1. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2019.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.