Critical period of weed competition in cowpea
Abstract
Weed competition is one of the factors that limit cowpea production in the world, causing losses of up to 90% of grain yield and quality. Knowledge of the critical period of weed competition (CPC) is important to prevent significant losses of grain and resources in the production process. The objective was to determine the critical period of weed competition in the cultivation of cowpea beans, Missouri cultivar, in two sowing seasons: dry (2022B) and rainy (2023A) of warm dry Colombian Caribbean. The randomized complete block design was used with eight treatments and four repetitions. The first four treatments corresponded to manual control of weeds in the intervals 0-10, 0-20, 0-30 and 0-50 days after emergence (DAE), the second four treatments corresponded to the crop-weed coexistence, in the same intervals. Cowpea grain yield, dry mass, cover and weed community composition were evaluated. The critical period of competition of weeds in the cowpea crop for the dry and rainy seasons was 14-33 and 14-29 days after emergence, respectively. The reduction in grain yield was 65.2% in the dry season and 80.46% in the rainy season. Rottboellia cochinchinensis had the highest occurrence rate with 30.3% and a density of 90 individuals per m2; which is important for the agronomic management of the crop in the humid Caribbean subregion.
Keywords
Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., Weed control, Interference, Yield, Dry and rainy season
References
- Al-Deliamy, A.O.A. and M.A. Abdul-Ameer. 2023. The allelopathic effect of root exudates of mungbean and maize plants affected by metabiolic, fertilizer and mechanical stress factors on some indicators of germination of cowpea seeds. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1213, 012026. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1213/1/012026
- Campos, M.L., M.L. Lacerda, I. Aspiazú, A.J. Carvalho, and S.R. Silva. 2023. Weed interference periods in cowpea crop. Rev. Caatigna 36(1), 1-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252023v36n101rc
- Cardona-Villadiego, C.E., H. Araméndiz-Tatis, C.E. Cardona-Ayala, and M.M. Espitia-Camacho. 2021. Evaluación agronómica y nutricional de ocho líneas de fríjol caupí (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp. Rev. Investig. Agrar. Ambient. 12(1), 29-38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.3709
- Carvalho, M., T. Lino-Neto, E. Rosa, and V. Carnide. 2017. Cowpea: a legume crop for a challenging environment. J. Sci. Food Agric. 97(13), 4273-4284. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8250
- Castro, T.S., P.R.R. Rocha, G.F. Barreto, S.S. Maia, J.A.A. Albuquerque, and J.M.A. Alves. 2019. Weed interference in semi-erect and semi-prostate cowpea cultivars. Planta Daninha 37, e019196146. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100080
- Cerna, L.A. and O.E. León. 2015. Determinación del período crítico de competencia de las malezas con el cultivo de frijol caupí. Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp variedad INIA 423 - vaina verde, bajo condiciones de riesgo por goteo. Pueblo Continente 26(2), 395-403.
- Coelho, C.G., L.P. Dalvi, L.S.G. Oliveira, and F.L. Oliveira. 2019. Production and nutrient accumulation of common bean cultivars under competition with weed. Planta Daninha 37, e019214474. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100151
- de la Cruz-Zapata, G., E. García-López, S. Sánchez-Soto, N. Bautista-Martínez, J.J. Ortiz-Díaz, and R. Osorio-Osorio. 2016. Identidad de mosca pinta (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) y sus hospederas en Cañaverales en Cárdenas, Tabasco, México. Southwest. Entomol. 41(1), 144-151. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3958/059.041.0116
- Grazziero, D.L.P., F.S. Adegas, A.F. Silva, and G. Concenço. 2019. Estimating yield losses in soybean due to sourgrass interference. Planta Daninha 37, e019190835. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100047
- Hernández-Ríos, I., E.S. Osuna-Ceja, J. Pimentel-López, and P. García-Saucedo. 2022. Control de malezas en maíz, frijol, girasol y sorgo: efecto de métodos de control bajo dos sistemas de siembra. Agro-Divulgación 2(6), 81-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.54767/ad.v2i6.137
- Lacerda, M.L., I. Aspiazú, A.J. Carvalho, A.F. Silva, E.A. Ferreira, A.A. Souza, M.L. Campos, and C.F.B. Brito. 2020. Periods of weed interference in cowpea crop in the semi-arid of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Braz.. J. Agrar. Sci. 5(2), e6749. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v15i2a6749
- Maia, S.S, P.R. Ribeiro-Rocha, T. Santiago-Castro, I.K.E. Costa da Silva, G. Ferreira-Barreto, L. Torres de Souza, H. Murga-Orrillo, and C. Abanto-Rodríguez. 2021. Interferencia de Cenchruse chinatus y Rottboellia exaltata en el crecimiento del frijol caupí. Bioagro 33(1), 21-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro331.3
- Marques, L.J.P., M.S. Bianco, S. Bianco, A.B.C. Filho, W.R. Cerveira Jr, and L.B. Carvalho. 2019. Weed interference on the accumulation of dry mass and macronutrients of eggplant ‘NÁPOLI’. Planta Daninha 37, e019191886. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100101
- Márquez-Quiroz, C., E. De-la-Cruz-Lázaro, R. Osorio-Osorio, and E. Sánchez-Chávez. 2015. Biofortification of cowpea beans with iron: iron´s influence on mineral content and yield. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut. 15(4), 839-847. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162015005000058
- Medeiros, I.F.S., P.S. Lima e Silva, R.P. Sousa, J. Silva, and R.M. Silva. 2021. Evaluation of selected cowpea varieties under competition with weeds. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 52(4), e20207202. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20210070
- MinAgricultura, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural Colombia. 2024. Agronet: área, producción y rendimiento nacional por cultivo. In: https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/paginas/home.aspx?cod=1; consulted: February, 2024.
- Osipitan, O. 2017. Weed interference and control in cowpea production: a review. J. Agric. Sci. 9(12), 11-20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n12p11
- Peerzada, A.M., A.A. Bajwa, H.H. Ali, and B.S. Chauhan. 2016. Biology, impact, and management of Echinochloa colona (L.) Link. Crop Prot. 83, 56-66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.01.011
- Pessôa, U.C.M., E.N. Silva Terceiro, A.S. Souza, A.A. Soares Filho, and T.A. Pimenta. 2015. Interferência de tiririca (Cyperus rotundus L.) e da compactação do solo no crescimento do feijão caupi. Revista Verde 10(5), 61-69. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18378/rvads.v10i5.4068
- Scavo, A. and G. Mauromicale. 2020. Integrated weed management in herbaceous field crops. Agronomy 10(4), 466. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040466
- Shabbir, A., B.S. Chauhan, and M.J. Walsh. 2019. Biology and management of Echinochloa colona and E. crus-galli in the northern grain regions of Australia. Crop Pasture Sci. 70(11), 917-925. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP19261
- Silva, A.A.P., A.M. Oliveira Neto, N. Guerra, E.O. Helvig, and C.D.G. Maciel. 2015. Interference periods among weeds and soybean RRTM crops in the western center area of the Brazilian state of Paraná. Planta Daninha 33(4), 707-716. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000400009
- Simunji, S., K.L. Munyinda, O.I. Lungu, A.M. Mweetwa, and E. Phiri. 2019. Evaluation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) genotypes for biological nitrogen fixation in maize cowpea crop rotation. Sustain. Agric. Res. 8(1), 82-93. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/sar.v8n1p82
- Vitorino, H., A.C. Silva-Junior, C. Gonçalves, and D. Martins. 2017. Interference of a weed community in the soybean crop in functions of sowing spacing. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 48(4), 605-613. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170070
- WHO, World Health Organization. 2024. Malnutrition. In: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition; consulted: April, 2024.
- Xiong, H., A. Shi, B. Mou, J. Qin, D. Motes, W. Lu, J. Ma, Y. Weng, W. Yang, and D. Wu. 2016. Genetic diversity and population structure of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). PLoS ONE 11(8), e0160941. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160941
- Yadav, T., N.K. Chopra, M.R. Yadav, R. Kumar, D.K. Rathore, P.G. Soni, G. Makarana, A. Tamta, M. Kushwah, H. Ram, R.K. Meena, and M. Singh. 2017. Weed management in cowpea-a review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6(2), 1373-1385. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.602.156