Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2016)

Vegetable section

Effect of tillage on the structural stability and resistance to penetration of a Inceptisol planted with arracacha (Arracacia xanthorrhiza Bancroft) in Boyaca

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2016v10i1.5049

Published 2016-07-11

  • Yomaira Liney Pinto-Acero
    • ,
  • Javier Giovanni Álvarez-Herrera
    • ,
  • Fabio Emilio Forero-Ulloa

Yomaira Liney Pinto-Acero
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Grupo de Investigaciones Agrícolas, Tunja

Javier Giovanni Álvarez-Herrera
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Grupo de Investigaciones Agrícolas, Tunja

Fabio Emilio Forero-Ulloa
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Tunja

Abstract

In the municipality of Boyaca (Boyaca, Colombia), arracacha production constitutes an important source of income for farmers. Because of the limited information on the technology used for this crop, the effect of different tillage systems (minimum tillage, conventional tillage and vertical tillage) on some of the main physical properties of a Typic Dystrudept was studied, with a slope of 3%, mountainous type landscape and hilly relief, using four sampling times (before preparation (E1), after preparation (E2), 100 days after planting (E3) and 180 days after planting (E4)). The design employed a randomized block, wherein each block corresponded to a type of farming and the treatments used two arracacha types (Yema de huevo and Paliverde). The lower values of penetration resistance were seen with the vertical tillage at 12.5, 17.5 and 20 cm with values of 262.8, 810.8 and 1337.5 kPa, respectively. Furthermore, the vertical tillage had a greater increased structural stability and larger percentage of aggregate distribution for sizes between 1 and 3 mm, with an average value of 31.4%, than the conventional tillage and minimum tillage, which had values of 22% and 25.2%, respectively, which favored root development in the arracacha plants. The biggest difference between the types of tillage in terms of aggregate size distribution was seen at 100 days after sowing. The evaluated arracacha materials did not significantly affect any of the evaluated soil parameters.

Keywords

Weighted mean diameter, Structural stability, Yema de huevo, Paliverde, Aggregates

PDF (Español)

References

  1. Alaouit, A., J. Lipiec y H.H. Gerke. 2011. A review of the changes in the soil pore system due to soil deformation: a hydrodynamic perspective. Soil Tillage Res. 115-116, 1-15.
  2. Alvarado, A. y L. Ochoa. Tecnologías locales de producción de arracacha (Arracacia xanthorrhiza Bancroft) en el municipio de Boyacá, departamento de Boyacá. Rev. UDCA Act. Div. Cient. 13(1), 125-133.
  3. Awad, Y.M., E. Blagodatskaya, Y.S. Ok y Y. Kuzyakov. 2013. Effects of polyacrylamide, biopolymer and biochar on the decomposition of 14C-labelled maize residues and on their stabilization in soil aggregates. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 64, 488-499. Doi: 10.1111/ejss.12034
  4. Barthes, B. y E. Roose. 2002. Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels. Catena 47, 133-149. Doi: 10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00180-1
  5. Baumgarten, W., T. Neugebauer, E. Fuchs y R. Horn. 2012. Structural stability of Marshland soils of the riparian zone of the tidal Elbe River. Soil Tillage Res. 125, 80-88. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.06.002
  6. Botta, G., D. Jorajuria y L. Draghi. 2002. Influence of the axle load, tire size and configuration, on the compaction of a freshly tilled clayey soil. J. Terramechanics 39, 47-54. Doi: 10.1016/S0022-4898(02)00003-4
  7. Casanova, E. y D. Lobo. 2007. Relación entre la física y la fertilidad de los suelos. Venesuelos 15(1), 42-56.
  8. Cortés, C., J. Camacho-Tamayo y F. Leiva. 2013. Análisis multivariado del comportamiento espacial y temporal de la resistencia del suelo a la penetración. Acta Agron. 62(3), 268-278.
  9. Dexter, A.R. y E.A. Czyż. 2011. Soil crumbling during tillage as a function of soil organic matter content. Int. Agrophysics (25), 215-221.
  10. EOT. Esquema de Ordenamiento Territorial del municipio de Boyacá. 2003. Alcaldía Municipal de Boyacá, Boyacá.
  11. Feinan, H., X. Chenyang, L. Hang, L. Song, Y. Zhenghong, L. Yue y H. Xinhua. 2015. Particles interaction forces and their effects on soil aggregates breakdown. Soil Tillage Res. 147, 1-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2014.11.006
  12. Ferreira, A.J.D., C. Coelho, R. Walsh, R.A. Shakesby, A. Ceballos y S. Doerr. 2000. Hydrological implications of soil water-repellency in Eucalyptus globulus forests, north-central Portugal. J. Hydrology 231-232, 165-177.
  13. Forsythe, W., F. Sancho y M. Villatoro. 2005. Efecto de la compactación de los suelos sobre el rendimiento de maíz en tres localidades de Costa Rica. Agron. Costar. 29(3), 175-185.
  14. García-Orenes, F., A. Cerda, J. Mataix-Solera, C. Guerrero, M. Bodi, V. Arcenegui, R. Zornoza y J. Sempere. 2009. Effects of agricultural management on Surface soil propierties and soil-water losses in Eastern Spain. Soil Tillage Res. 106, 117-123.
  15. Gentile, R., B. Vanlauwe y J. Six. 2011. Litter quality impacts short- but not long-term soil carbon dynamics in soil aggregate fractions. Ecol. Applications 21, 695-703. Doi: 10.2307/23021619
  16. González, O., C. Iglesias, M. Herrera, A. López y A. Iznaga. 2008. Efecto de la humedad y la presión sobre el suelo en la porosidad total de un Rhodic Ferralsol. Rev. Cienc. Téc. Agropecu. 17(2), 50-54.
  17. Grosbellet, C., L. Vidal-Beaudet, V. Caubel y S. Charpentier. 2011. Improvement of soil structure formation by degradation of coarse organic matter. Geoderma 162(1), 27-38. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma. 2011.01.003
  18. Gysi, M., V. Maeder y P. Weisskopf. 2001. Pressure distribution underneath tires of agricultural vehicles. Transactions of ASA 44(6), 1385-1389. Doi: 10.13031/2013.7001
  19. Hamza M. y W. Anderson W. 2005. Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Tillage Res. 82, 121-145. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009
  20. Henríquez, C., O. Ortiz, K. Largaespada, P. Portuguez, M. Vargas, P. Villalobos y D. Gómez. 2011. Determinación de la resistencia a la penetración, al corte tangencial, densidad aparente y temperatura en un suelo cafetalero, Juan Viñas, Costa Rica. Agronomía Costarricense 35(1), 175-184.
  21. IGAC. 2006. Métodos analíticos de laboratorio de suelos. 6ª ed. Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi, Bogotá.
  22. Keller, T. y M. Lamande. 2010. Challenges in the development of analytical soil compaction models. Soil Tillage Res. 111, 54-64. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.08.004
  23. Keller, T., M. Lamande, S. Peth, M. Berli, J.-Y. Delenne, W. Baumgarten, W. Rabbel, F. Radjaı, J. Rajchenbach, A.P.S. Selvadurai y D. Or. 2013. An interdisciplinary approach towards improved understanding of soil deformation during compaction. Soil Tillage Res. 128, 61-80. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.10.004
  24. Kim, H., S.H. Anderson, P.P. Motavalli y C.J. Gantzer. 2010. Compaction effects on soil macropore geometry and related parameters for an arable field. Geoderma 160, 244-251. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.09.030
  25. Kirby, J., B. Blunden y C. Trein. 1997. Simulating soil deformation using a critical state model: II. Soil compaction beneath tyres and tracks. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 48, 59-70. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00185.x
  26. Kirsch, R. 2010. Petrophysical properties of permeable and low-permeable rocks. pp. 1-22. En: Kirsch, R. (ed.). Groundwater geophysics. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  27. Lamandé, M. y P. Schjonning. 2011. Transmission of vertical stress in a real soil profile. Part III. Effect of soil water content. Soil Tillage Res. 114, 78-85. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.10.001
  28. Lipiec, J. M. Hajnos y R. Świeboda. 2012. Estimating effects of compaction on pore size distribution of soil aggregates by mercury porosimeter. Geoderma 179-180, 20-27. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.02.014
  29. Pagliai, M., A. Marsili, P. Servadio, N. Vignozzi y S. Pellegrini. 2003. Changes in some physical properties of a clay soil in Central Italy following the passage of rubber tracked and wheeled tractors of medium power. Soil Tillage Res. 73, 119-129. Doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00105-3
  30. Ramírez-López, L., A. Reina-Sánchez y J. Camacho-Tamayo. 2008. Variabilidad espacial de atributos físicos de un Typic haplustox de los llanos orientales de Colombia. Eng. Agríc. 28(1), 55-63.
  31. Lal, R. y M.K. Shukla. 2004. Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
  32. Safar, S., H. González y N. Cappelli. 2011. Efecto de los arados rotativos sobre algunas propiedades físicas de un suelo franco arcilloso. CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia 6(1), 32-44.
  33. Siczek, A. y J. Lipiec. 2011. Soybean nodulation and nitrogen fixation in response to soil compaction and surface straw mulching. Soil Tillage Res. 114, 50-56.
  34. Terminiello A., R. Balbuena, M. Ariata, J. Hilbert, J. Claverie J. y D. Jorajuria. 2007. Compactación inducida por el tránsito vehicular sobre un suelo en producción hortícola. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Amb. 4(2), 290-293. Doi: 10.1590/S1415-43662000000200027
  35. Volveras, M. y C. Amezquita. 2009. Estabilidad Estructural del suelo bajo diferentes sistemas y tiempo de uso en laderas Andinas de Nariño, Colombia. Acta Agron. 58(1), 35-39.
  36. Yu, W.Z., T. Liu, J. Gregory, G.B. Li, H.J. Liu, y J.H. Qu. 2012. Aggregation of nano-sized alum–humic primary particles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 99, 44-49. Doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.08.017
  37. Zhang, W., J. Crittenden, K. Li y Y. Chen. 2012. Attachment efficiency of nano-particle aggregation in aqueous dispersions: modeling and experimental validation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 7054-7062. Doi: 10.1021/es203623z

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>