Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2023)
Inquietud Empresarial 23(1) January-June 2023

SUSTAINABILITY

Bibliometric Review of the Literature on the Social and Solidarity Economy in the Areas of Economy, Econometry, Finance, Business, Management and Accounting

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.15523

Published 2023-05-06

  • Xochitl Berenise Gonzales-Torres
    • ,
  • Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera
    • ,
  • Martha Cecilia Méndez-Prada
    • ,
  • Jorge Antonio Acevedo-Martínez

Xochitl Berenise Gonzales-Torres
División de estudios de posgrado e investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México/ Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; Avenida Ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja No. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, C.P. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México

Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera
División de estudios de posgrado e investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México/ Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; Avenida Ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja No. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, C.P. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México

Martha Cecilia Méndez-Prada
Facultad de ciencias económicas y administrativas, Corporación Universitaria del Caribe; carretera troncal de occidente, Kilómetro 1 Vía Corozal, Sincelejo, Sucre, Colombia

Jorge Antonio Acevedo-Martínez
División de estudios de posgrado e investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México/ Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; Avenida Ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja No. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, C.P. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México

Abstract

The objective of this article is to analyze the scientific production on the Social and Solidarity Economy (ESS) in the areas of economics, econometrics, finance, business, management and accounting; through the use of bibliometric techniques. The study is carried out in a period of 50 years, between 1971 and 2021, whose main source is the Scopus database; additionally, the information is analyzed using the VOSviewer software. The search yielded a total of 727 documents related to the field addressed, finding that the United States is the leading country in scientific production; 93 % of the works consulted were scientific articles, the topics related to the SSE are: solidarity, sustainability, microfinance, inequality, autonomy, social movements, cooperatives, social justice, gender, women, agroecology, and social responsibility. It is important to consider that scientific progress in all fields increases day by day, therefore, the data changes. It is concluded that it is essential to understand the processes related to the SSE in the mentioned areas, as it is a potential to develop economic activities based on values such as justice, equity, transparency, and cooperativism.

JEL Codes: R1, A12, Y8, Z0

Received: 19/01/2023.  Accepted: 14/04/2023.  Published: 06/05/2023. 

Keywords

social solidarity economy, economics and econometrics, management and business, accounting, scientific productivity, scientific mapping, bibliometrics

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

Author Biography

Xochitl Berenise Gonzales-Torres

 

 

 

Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera

 

 

Martha Cecilia Méndez-Prada

 

 

 

 

Jorge Antonio Acevedo-Martínez

 

 

References

  1. Alarcón-Conde, M. Á., y Álvarez- Rodríguez, J. F. (2020). The social balance and the relations between the sustainable development goals and the cooperative principles for colombia under a social network analysis. CIRIEC-Espana Revista de Economia Publica, Social y
  2. Cooperativa, (99), 57-87. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.99.14322
  3. Altıntaş, M. H., Kılıç, S., y Akhan, C. E. (2020). The transformation of the e-tailing field: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal Of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(2), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2018-0232
  4. Amin, A., y Thomas, D. (1996). The negotiated economy: State and civic institutions in Denmark. Economy and Society, 25(2), 255-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000012
  5. Bauhardt, C. (2014). Solutions to the crisis? The Green New Deal, Degrowth, and the Solidarity Economy: Alternatives to the capitalist growth economy from an ecofeminist economics perspective. Ecological Economics, (102), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2014.03.015
  6. Beramendi, P. (2007). Inequality and the territorial fragmentation of solidarity. International Organization, 61(4), 783-820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070270
  7. Binzel, C., y Fehr, D. (2013). Social distance and trust: Experimental evidence from a slum in Cairo. Journal of Development Economics, 103(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDEVECO.2013.01.009
  8. Brammer, E., Jackson, G., y Matten, D. (2012). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y Teoría Institucional: Nuevas Perspectivas sobre la Gobernanza Privada. Revista Socioeconómica, (10), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr030
  9. Brosig-Koch, J., Helbach, C., Ockenfels, A., y Weimann, J. (2011). Still different after all these years: Solidarity behavior in East and West Germany. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11-12), 1373-1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2011.06.002
  10. Carrin, G., y James, C. (2005). Social health insurance: Key factors affecting the transition towards universal coverage. International Social Security Review, 58(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-246X.2005.00209.X
  11. Chaves-Ávila, R., y Gallego-Bono, J. R. (2020). Transformative policies for the social and solidarity economy: The new generation of public policies fostering the social economy in order to achieve sustainable development goals. The European and Spanish cases.
  12. Sustainability, 12(10), e4059. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12104059
  13. Chaves-Ávila, R., y Monzón-Campos, J. L. (2018). The social economy facing emerging economic concepts: Social innovation, social responsibility, collaborative economy, social enterprises and solidary economy. CIRIEC-Espana Revista de Economia Publica, Social y Cooperativa, (93), 5-50. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.93.12901
  14. Cheney, G., Santa Cruz, I., Peredo, A. M., y Nazareno, E. (2014). Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization, 21(5), 591-603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414539784
  15. Coraggio, J. L., Hillenkamp, I., Farah, I., Guridi, L., Pérez de Mendiguren, J. C., y Puig, C. (2016). Economía Social y Solidaria: conceptos, prácticas y politicas publicas. Hegoa.
  16. Dávila Rodríguez, M., Guzmán Sáenz, R., Arroyo, H. M., Piñeres Herera, D., De La, D., Barranco, R., y Caballero-Uribe, C. V. (2009). Bibliometría: conceptos y utilidades para el estudio médico y la formación profesional Bibliometrics: concepts and utility to study and medical training. Salud Uninorte Barranquilla (Col.), 25(2), 319–330.
  17. Dugger, W. M. (1988). Radical Institutionalism: Basic Concepts. Review of Radical Political Economics, 20(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/048661348802000101
  18. Fajardo, G., y Frantzeskaki, M. (2017). La economía social y solidaria en Grecia. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 125, 49–88. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.58135
  19. Forno, F., y Graziano, P. R. (2014). Sustainable community movement organizations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514526225
  20. Fridell, G. (2007). Fair-trade coffee and commodity fetishism: The limits of market-driven social justice. Historical Materialism, 15(4), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920607X245841
  21. Galán Serrano, J., Forés Tomás, C., y Felip Miralles, F. (2018). Integración de los principios de la economía social y solidaria en el diseño sostenible de bienes de consumo. Economía y Sociedad, 23(54), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.15359/eys.23-54.7
  22. Gálvez Toro, A., y Amezcua, M. (2006). El factor h de Hirsch: the h-index: Una actualización sobre los métodos de evaluación de los autores y sus aportaciones en publicaciones científicas. Index de Enfermería, 15(55), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1132-12962006000300009
  23. Gaviria-Marín, M., Merigó, J. M., y Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (140), 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
  24. Guerra, P. (2019). ¿Es el lucro un elemento decisivo en la delimitación de las organizaciones cooperativas y de la Economía Social Solidaria? Un análisis comparado de las legislaciones de comienzo del siglo XXI. Áreas. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales, (39), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.6018/AREAS.408471
  25. Höpner, M., y Schäfer, A. (2012). Embeddedness and regional integration: Waiting for polanyi in a Hayekian Setting. International Organization, 66(3), 429-455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081831200015X
  26. Huo, B., Fu, D., Zhao, X., y Zhu, J. (2016). Curbing opportunism in logistics outsourcing relationships: The role of relational norms and contract. International Journal of Production Economics, (182), 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2016.07.005
  27. Jäger, U. P., y Schröer, A. (2014). Integrated Organizational Identity: A Definition of Hybrid Organizations and a Research Agenda. Voluntas, 25(5), 1281-1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11266-013-9386-1
  28. Kinderman, D. (2009). "Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!" The Co-Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010. Socio-Economic Review, 29-57. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/ser/mwr028
  29. Kronenberg, J., Haase, A., Łaszkiewicz, E., Antal, A., Baravikova, A., Biernacka, M., Dushkova, D., Filčak, R., Haase, D., Ignatieva, M., Khmara, Y., Niţă, M. R., y Onose, D. A. (2020). Environmental justice in the context of urban green space availability, accessibility, and attractiveness in postsocialist cities. Cities, (106). https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr028
  30. Kumbamu, A. (2018). Building sustainable social and solidarity economies: Place-based and network-based strategies of alternative development organizations in India. Community Development, 49(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2017.1384744
  31. Lee, S. (2019). Role of social and solidarity economy in localizingthe sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1670274
  32. Lévesque, C., y Murray, G. (2002). Local versus global: Activating local union power in the global economy. Labor Studies Journal, 27(3), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X0202700304
  33. Marconatto, D., Ladeira, W. J., y Wegner, D. (2019). The sustainability of solidarity economy organizations: An empirical investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, (228), 1122-1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.352
  34. Marks, G. (2012). Europe and its empires: From Rome to the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-5965.2011.02218.X
  35. Miguel, S., Moya-Anegón, F., y Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). El análisis de co-citas como método de investigación en Bibliotecología y Ciencia de la Información. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología e Información, 21(43). https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2007.43.4129
  36. Montero-Díaz, J., Cobo, M. J., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Segado-Boj, F., y Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Mapeo científico de la Categoría «Comunicación» en WoS (1980-2013). Grupo Comunicar, 26(55), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-08
  37. Naylor, R., y Cripps, M. (1993). An economic theory of the open shop trade union. European Economic Review, 37(8), 1599-1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(93)90123-R
  38. Novillo, E. (2016). La Economía Social y Solidaria: una economía para las personas. El Portal de la Economía Solidaria. https://www.economiasolidaria.org/recursos/biblioteca-la-economia-social-y-solidaria-una-economia-para-las-personas/
  39. Ockenfels, A., y Weimann, J. (1999). Types and patterns: an experimental East-West-German comparison of cooperation and solidarity. Journal of Public Economics, 71(2), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00072-3
  40. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2014). La Economía Social y Solidaria y el Reto del Desarrollo Sostenible.Un documento de posición elaborado por el Grupo de Trabajo Interinstitucional de las Naciones Unidas sobre Economía Social y Solidaria. ONU.
  41. Quiroz-Niño, C., y Murga-Menoyo, M. Á. (2017). Social and solidarity economy, sustainable development goals, and community development: The mission of adult education y training. Sustainability, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU9122164
  42. Quispe Condori, J., y Delgado Fernández, M. (2010). Aplicación del modelo comunitario para el desarrollo integral de las comunidades en Bolivia. Ingeniería Industrial, 31(2), 1-6.
  43. Rankin, K. N. (2011). Social Capital, Microfinance, and the Politics of Development. Feminist Economics, 8(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700210125167
  44. Rodríguez, R., Castro, A., y González, J. (2021). El índice h y la identidd digital de los investigadores en los sistemas cientidico- tecnológicos. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, (13), 165-174.
  45. Rojas, H. J. (2020). La economía social solidaria y la política social del nuevo gobierno federal. Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 29(57), 68-87. https://doi.org/10.20983/noesis.2020.1.4
  46. Rosser, J. B., Rosser, M. V., y Ahmed, E. (2000). Income Inequality and the Informal Economy in Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(1), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1006/JCEC.2000.1645
  47. Sahakian, M. D., y Dunand, C. (2015). The social and solidarity economy towards greater “sustainability”: Learning across contexts and cultures, from Geneva to Manila. Community Development Journal, 50(3), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu054
  48. Salgado, J., y Páez, D. (2007). La productividad científica y el índice h de Hirchs de la psicología social española: convergencia entre indicadores de productividad y comparación con otras áreas. Psicothema, (19), 179-189.
  49. Schmid, G. (2006). Social risk management through transitional labour markets. Socio-Economic Review, 4(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/SER/MWJ029
  50. Scholte, J. A. (1996). The geography of collective identities in a globalizing world. Review of International Political Economy, 3(4), 565-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434374
  51. Schwab do Nascimento, F., Calle-Collado, Á., y Muñoz Benito, R. (2020). Economía social y solidaria y agroeco- logía en cooperativas de agricultura familiar en Brasil como forma de desarrollo de una agricultura sostenible. CIRIEC. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.98.14161
  52. Silver, H. (1994). Social Exclusion and Social Solidarity: Three Paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5-6), 531-578.
  53. Solano, E., Castellanos, S., López, M., y Hernández, J. (2009). La bibliometría: una herramienta eficaz para evaluar la actividad científica postgraduada. Medisur: Revista Electrónica de las Ciencias Médicas en Cienfuegos, 7(4), 59-62.
  54. Stodolska, M., y Alexandris, K. (2004). The role of recreational sport in the adaptation of first generation immigrants in the United States. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(3), 379-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950029
  55. Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 471-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8543.2009.00746.X
  56. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238
  57. Tiberius, V., Schwarzer, H., y Roig-Dobón, S. (2020). Radical innovations: Between established knowledge and future research opportunities. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 6(3), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.09.001
  58. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., y Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, (14), 207-223.
  59. Urbizagástegui Alvarado, R. (2005). La productividad científica de los autores: un modelo de aplicación de la ley de Lotka por el método del poder inverso generalizado. Información, cultura y sociedad, (12), 51-73.
  60. Vaillancourt, Y. (2009). Social economy in the co-construction of public policy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 275-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8292.2009.00387.X
  61. Van Eck, N. J., y Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-009-0146-3/FIGURES/7
  62. Villalba-Eguiluz, U., Egia-Olaizola, A., y de Mendiguren, J. C. P. (2020). Convergences between the social and solidarity economy and sustainable development goals: Case study in the Basque Country. Sustainability, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135435
  63. Villalba-Eguiluz, U. (2020). La economía social y solidaria y el Buen Vivir en Ecuador. En C. Carranza Barona y A. Martínez Galarza (comps.), Desafíos de la Economía Solidaria y Comunitaria. Editorial Ecuador Sapiens.
  64. Wallimann, I. (2014). Social and solidarity economy for sustainable development: its premises and the Social Economy Basel example of practice. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.894345
  65. Wanderly, F. (2020). Los actores de la economía social y solidaria en Bolivia. Documento de trabajo, Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas (IISEC), Universidad Católica Boliviana.
  66. Zarta Ávila, P. (2018). La sustentabilidad o sostenibilidad: un concepto poderoso para la humanidad. Tabula Rasa, (28), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.n28.18
  67. Zhou, L., Wu, W. P., y Luo, X. (2007). Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: the mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIBS.8400282

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)