Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé

n. 39 (2022)
Publicação contínua

Linguagem y comunicação

Tradução automática de um conjunto de treinamento para extração semântica de relações

https://doi.org/10.19053/0121053X.n39.2022.13436

Publicado 2022-03-07

  • Jefferson A. Peña Torres
    • ,
  • Víctor Bucheli
    • ,
  • Raúl E. Gutiérrez de Piñérez Reyes

Jefferson A. Peña Torres
Universidad del Valle, Colombia

Víctor Bucheli
Universidad del Valle, Colombia

Raúl E. Gutiérrez de Piñérez Reyes
Universidad del Valle, Colombia

Resumo

A tradução automática (TA) é usada para obter corpus anotados partindo de corpus da língua inglesa, que podem ser aplicáveis a diferentes tarefas de processamento de linguagem natural (PLN). Levando em conta que existem mais recursos ou conjuntos de dados para treinamento de modelos PLN em inglês, este artigo explora a aplicação da TA para automatizar tarefas PLN em espanhol. Desta forma, o artigo descreve um conjunto de dados para extração de relações genéricas (reACE) e a construção de um modelo de extração semântica de relações em espanhol (ER), baseado no conjunto de amostras traduzidas do inglês para o espanhol. Os resultados mostram que para a tarefa de TA é necessário implementar um processo de pré-edição do corpus em inglês, a fim de evitar erros de tradução e pós-edição e manter as anotações do corpus original. Os modelos ER em espanhol alcançam medidas de acurácia, completude e valor F comparáveis às obtidas pelo modelo na língua inglesa, o que sugere que a tradução automática é uma ferramenta útil para realizar tarefas de PLN na língua espanhola.

Palavras-chave

linguística computacional, tradução automática, linguística de corpus, extração de relações

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

Referências

  • Ananthram, A., Allaway, E., & McKeown, K. (2020). Event Guided Denoising for Multilingual Relation Learning. arXiv preprint: arXiv:2012.02721. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.131
  • Anastasopoulos, A. (2019). An Analysis of Source-Side Grammatical Errors in NMT. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1905.10024.
  • Bach, N., & Sameer, B. (2007). A Survey on Relation Extraction. Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University 178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7359-5_6
  • Bahr, R. H., Lebby, S., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2020). Spelling Error Analysis of Written Summaries in an Academic Register by Students with Specific Learning Disabilities: Phonological, Orthographic, and Morphological Influences. Reading and Writing, 33(1), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09977-0
  • Belinkov, Y., & Glass, J. (2019). Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Survey. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7, 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00254
  • Carrino, C. P., Costa-Jussà, M. R., & Fonollosa, J. A. (2020). Automatic Spanish Translation of SQuAD Dataset for Multilingual Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (5515-5523).
  • Castillo, M. N. (2020). Corpus Básico del Español de Chile ©: metodología de procesamiento y análisis. Lexis, 44(2), 483-523. https://doi.org/10.18800/lexis.202002.004
  • Cheng, Y. (2019). Neural Machine Translation. In Joint Training for Neural Machine Translation (1-10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9748-7_1
  • Collantes, C., Mallo, J., Parra, C., Quiñones, H. & Serrano, R. (2018). Pásate al lado oscuro: ventajas de la traducción automática para el traductor profesional. La Linterna del Traductor, 17, 33-39.
  • Gamallo, P., & García, M. (2017). LinguaKit: Uma ferramenta multilingue para a análise linguística e a extração de informação. Linguamática, 9(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.21814/lm.9.1.243
  • Guan, H., Li, J., Xu, H., & Devarakonda, M. (2020). Robustly Pre-trained Neural Model for Direct Temporal Relation Extraction. arXiv preprint: arXiv:2004.06216. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI52183.2021.00090
  • Gurulingappa, H., Rajput, A. M., Roberts, A., Fluck, J., Hofmann-Apitius, M., & Toldo, L. (2012). Development of a Benchmark Corpus to Support the Automatic Extraction of Drug-Related Adverse Effects from Medical Case Reports. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(5), 885–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2012.04.008
  • Hachey, B., Grover, C., & Tobin, R. (2012). Datasets for Generic Relation Extraction. Natural Language Engineering, 18(1), 21–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1351324911000106
  • Haque, R., Hasanuzzaman, M., & Way, A. (2020). Analysing Terminology Translation Errors in Statistical and Neural Machine Translation. Machine Translation, 34(2), 149-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-02009251-z
  • Hidalgo-Ternero, C. M. (2021). Google Translate vs. DeepL. MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación, 154-177.
  • Kramer, O. (2016). Scikit-learn. In Machine learning for evolution strategies. Studies in Big Data, vol 20 (pp. 45-53). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33383-0_5
  • Kumar, S. (2017). A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Relation Extraction. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1705.03645.
  • Lin, Y., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2017). Neural Relation Extraction with Multi-Lingual Attention. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 34–43. Association for Computational Linguistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1004
  • Mesquita, F., Schmidek, J., & Barbosa, D. (2013). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Open Relation Extraction. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 447-457. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  • Mikelenić, B., & Tadić, M. (2020). Building the Spanish-Croatian Parallel Corpus. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 3932-3936. European Language Resources Association
  • Mitchell, A., Strassel, S., Huang, S., & Zakhary, R. (2005). Ace 2004 Multilingual Training Corpus. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, 1, 1-1.
  • Nasar, Z., Jaffry, S. W., & Malik, M. K. (2021). Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction: State-of-the-Art. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3445965
  • Ni, J., & Florian, R. (2019). Neural Cross-Lingual Relation Extraction Based on Bilingual Word Embedding Mapping. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1911.00069. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1038
  • Pastor, G. C. (2018). Laughing One’s Head Off in Spanish Subtitles: A Corpus-Based Study on Diatopic Variation and Its Consequences for Translation1. Fraseología, Diatopía y Traducción/Phraseology, Diatopic Variation and Translation, 17, 32. https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.17.03co
  • Pawar, S., Palshikar, G. K., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2017). Relation Extraction: A Survey. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1712.05191.
  • Popović, M. (2020). Relations Between Comprehensibility and Adequacy Errors in Machine Translation Output. In Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, (pp. 256-264). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.19
  • Pyysalo, S., Ginter, F., Heimonen, J., Björne, J., Boberg, J., Järvinen, J., & Salakoski, T. (2007). BioInfer: A Corpus for Information Extraction in the Biomedical Domain. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-50
  • Rodrigues, J., & Branco, A. (2020). Argument Identification in a Language Without Labeled Data. In International Conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language, (pp. 335-345). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41505-1_32
  • Sánchez, A. (2010). Traducción automática, corpus lingüísticos y desambiguación automática de los significados de las palabras. En R. Rabadán, M. Fernández & T. Guzmán (coords.), Lengua, traducción, recepción: en honor de Julio César Santoyo, vol. 1 (pp. 555-587). Universidad de León, Área de Publicaciones.
  • Smirnova, A., & Cudré-Mauroux, P. (2018). Relation Extraction Using Distant Supervision: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(5), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241741
  • Torres, J. P., De Piñérez Reyes, R. G., & Bucheli, V. A. (2018). Support Vector Machines for Semantic Relation Extraction in Spanish Language. Colombian Conference on Computing, 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98998- 3_26
  • Verga, P., Belanger, D., Strubell, E., Roth, B., & McCallum, A. (2015). Multilingual Relation Extraction Using Compositional Universal Schema. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1511.06396. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1103
  • Virmani, C., Pillai, A., & Juneja, D. (2017). Extracting Information from Social Networks Using NLP. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 13(4), 621-630.
  • Walker, C., Strassel, S., Medero, J., & Maeda, K. (2006). ACE 2005 Multilingual Training Corpus. Linguistic Data Consortium. https://doi.org/10.35111/mwxc-vh88
  • Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q., Norouzi, M., Machery, W., Krikun, M. et al. (2016). Google’s Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap Between Human and Machine Translation. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1609.08144.
  • Yamada, M. (2019). The Impact of Google Neural Machine Translation on Post-Editing by Student Translators. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 31, 87-106.
  • Zelenko, D., Chinatsu, A., and Anthony, R. (2003, Feb.). Kernel Methods for Relation Extraction. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 1083-1106. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3115/1118693.1118703
  • Zhang, Q., Mengdong C., and Lianzhong, L. (2017). A Review on Entity Relation Extraction. In 2017 Second International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering (ICMCCE). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCCE.2017.14
  • Zhila, A., & Gelbukh, A. (2013). Comparison of Open Information Extraction for Spanish and English. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies, 12(1), 794-802.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.