Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Social Subjects Construction in EFL Teaching Education Programs: Challenges and Opportunities

Abstract

This article reports the partial results of a research project aimed at interpreting how social actors in Bachelor Degrees programs in Foreign Languages understand the meanings of education. As such, this paper is a first attempt to understand that English Teacher Formation programs have been conceived based on economic models that focus on the construction of skills related to knowledge of the field of study, instead of providing spaces that strengthen the construction of social subjects. We conclude that for English Teacher Formation programs it is necessary to concentrate on possibilities that allow future teachers to be aware of their interculturalities in order to become social subjects. This requires that future teachers negotiate with their communities the critical evaluation of teaching materials, and the comprehension of local contexts.

Keywords

subjects, interculturality, pre-service teachers, English teaching, humanism

pdf (Español) XML (Español)

References

  1. Aguirre, J. & Ramos, B. (2011). Fostering Skills to Enhance Critical Educators: A Pedagogical Proposal for Pre-service Teachers. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English,18(1) 169-197.
  2. Cadavid-Ramírez, L. M. (2014). Los sofistas: maestros del areté en la paideia griega. Revista Perseitas, 2(1), 37-61.
  3. Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
  4. Cárdenas, R. (2009). Tendencias globales y locales en la formación de docentes de lenguas extranjeras. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 14(22), 71-105.
  5. Cruz-Rodríguez, E. (2013). Multiculturalismo e interculturalismo: una lectura comparada Cuadernos Interculturales, 11(20), 45-76.
  6. European Association for the Education of Adults. (n.d). Explaining the Concept of Bildung in Relation to sdg 4. SDG Watch Europe. https://doi.org/10.19053/0121053X.n40.2023.1511811
  7. Gadamer, H. G. (1996). Verdad y método I. Fundamentos de una hermenéutica filosófica. (Trad. A. Aparicio y R. de Agapito). Sígueme.
  8. Gómez Sará, M. M. (2017). Review and Analysis of the Colombian Foreign Language Bilingualism Policies and Plans. HOW, 24(1), 139-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.24.1.343
  9. González, A. (2009). On Alternative and Additional Certifications in English Language Teaching: The Case of Colombian EFL Professional Development. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 14(2), 183-209.
  10. Guerrero, C. (2008). Bilingual Colombia: What Does it Mean to Be Bilingual Within the Framework of the National Plan of Bilingualism? Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 10(1), 27-45.
  11. Guerrero-Nieto, C. H., & Quintero, A. (2021). Elementary School Teachers in Neoliberal Times: The Silent Voices that Make Educational Policies Work. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 23(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v23n1.83052
  12. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Postmethod Condition: (E)merging Strategies for Second/ Foreign Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48.
  13. Martínez Boom, A. (2004). De la escuela expansiva a la escuela competitiva: dos modos de modernización en América Latina. Editorial Anthropos, Convenio Andrés Bello.
  14. Ministerio de Educación Nacional −MEN−. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: inglés. Formar en lenguas extranjeras: ¡el reto! Lo que necesitamos saber y saber hacer. Imprenta Nacional.
  15. Ministerio de Educación Nacional −MEN−. (2006a). Políticas educativas. Enseñanza del inglés en Colombia. British Council. http://www.britishcouncil.org/es/men-2-presentacion.pdf
  16. Ministerio de Educación Nacional −MEN−. (2006b). Estándares básicos de competencias en lengua extranjera: inglés. Formar en lenguas extranjeras: el reto. Colombia Aprende. http//www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/mediateca/1607/articles.115375_archivo.pdf
  17. Ministerio de Educación Nacional −MEN−. (2014) Programa Nacional de Inglés: Colombia Very Well. Universidad de La Salle, sede Bogotá.
  18. Ministerio de Educación Nacional −MEN−. (2016) Colombia Bilingüe: Conozca el programa. Colombia Aprende. http://aprende.colombiaaprende.edu.co/es/colombiabilingue/86718
  19. Moll, L. & González, N. (2004). Engaging Life: A Funds-Of-Knowledge Approach to Multicultural Education. In J. Banks (ed.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education (pp. 699-715). Jossey-Bass.
  20. Noguera-Ramírez, C.E, & Parra, G.A. (2015) Pedagogización de la sociedad y crisis de la educación. Elementos para una crítica de la(s) crítica(s). Pedagogía y Saberes, (43), 69-78. https://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/PYS/article/view/3868
  21. Núñez-Pardo, A. (2018). The English Textbook. Tensions from an Intercultural Perspective. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, (17), 230-259. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.402
  22. Ramírez, A. (2020). Challenges in the Design and Implementation of an English Placement Test for a Colombian Public University. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 21, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.825
  23. Ramos, B. (2021). Critical Interculturality: A Key Element in the Construction of Social Subjects in Pre-service Foreign Language Teachers’ Education. In A. Álvarez, A. Valencia, & O. Vergara (eds.), Interculturality in Language Teacher Education. Theoretical and Practical Considerarions (pp. 97-120). Universidad del Valle, Colombia.
  24. Ramos, B. & Aguirre, J. (2014). Materials Development in the Colombian Context: Some Considerations about Its Benefits and Challenges. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 21(2), 134-150.
  25. Ramos, B. & Aguirre, J. (2016). English Language Teaching in Rural Areas: A New Challenge for English Language Teachers in Colombia. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica, (27), 209-222.
  26. Rico, C. (2012). Language Teaching Matrerials as Mediators for ICC Development: A challenge for material developers. Signo y Pensamiento, 30,130-154. Páez, E. (2009). De las utopías de la pedagogía y las pedagogías de la utopía. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispanica, (14), 81-94.
  27. Pulverness, A. (2003). Materials for Cultural Awareness, in B. Tomlinson (ed.), Developing Materials for Language Teaching (pp. 426-438). Continuum.
  28. Schuck, R. (2020). Formación (Bildung) y apropiación de la tradición en tiempos tecnológicos. Cuestiones de Filosofía, 6(27), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v6.n27.2020.12027
  29. Soto- Molina, J. & Méndez, P. (2020). Linguistic Colonialism in the English Language Textbooks of Multinational Publishing Houses. HOW, A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English, 27(1), 11-28.
  30. Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. Continuum Press.
  31. Touraine, A. (1997). ¿Podremos vivir juntos? Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  32. Tylor, E. (1871). Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art and Custom. John Murray.
  33. Usma, J. (2009). Education and Language Policy in Colombia: Exploring Processes of inclusion, Exclusion, and Stratification in Times of Global Reform. Profile, Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, (11), 123-142.
  34. Vergara, O., Hernández, F. & Cárdenas, R. (2009). Classroom Research and Professional Development. Profile, Issues in a Teachers’ Professional Developtment, (11), 169-191.
  35. Vilanou, C. (2001). De la Paideia a la Bildung: hacia una pedagogía hermenéutica. Revista Portuguesa de Educacao, 14(2). https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=37414210
  36. Zemelman, H. (2010). Sujeto y subjetividad: la problemática de las alternativas como construcción posible. Polis, 9(27), 355-366.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.