Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 13 No. 32 (2022)
Challenges and opportunities for research in Music Education

Investigación y pedagogía

Reading strategies and academic performance in the transition to higher education

https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v13.n32.2022.12809

Published 2022-01-01

  • Yudi Herrera-Nuñez
    • ,
  • Bianca Dapelo, Dra.

Yudi Herrera-Nuñez
Universidad de Playa Ancha

Bianca Dapelo, Dra.
Universidad de Viña del Mar

Abstract

The transition path to university is an enormously complex adaptation process that challenges institutions to develop mechanisms to promote the long-term attendance of students until they graduate. This research aims to contribute to the understanding of the use of reading strategies and their connection with students’ academic achievement during the transition to higher education. The methodology is quantitative, with an intentional non-probabilistic sample of 145 volunteers: high school students from
schools with a high vulnerability index and incoming students from a public university in the Valparaíso Region in Chile, through the implementation of an instrument. Among the main results, we find that the groups of high school and university students differ
significantly in the type and use of reading strategies, which are directly and significantly correlated with academic performance and are relevant because using different strategies has an impact on the reading level of students with low academic performance, especially in middle school.

Keywords

reading strategies, academic performance, educational transition, academic literacy

PDF (Español) HTML (Español) EPUB (Español) XML (Español)

Author Biography

Bianca Dapelo, Dra.

Psicóloga, Ha trabajado dirigiendo y desarrollando proyectos de nivelación educativa y Talento.

References

  1. Afflerbach, P. (1990). The Influence of Prior Knowledge and Text Genre on Readers’ Prediction Strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969009547700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969009547700
  2. Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. (2014). Identifying and Describing Constructively Responsive Comprehension Strategies in New and Traditional Forms of Reading. (2014). En S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension (pp. 93-114). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759609-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759609-15
  3. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., & Kim, J. (2015). Conceptualizing and Assessing Higher-Order Thinking in Reading. Theory Into Practice, 54(3), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367
  4. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., Kim, J., Crassas, M., & Doyle, B. (2013). Reading: What Else Matters Besides Strategies and Skills? The Reading Teacher, 66(6), 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1146
  5. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P., & Paris, S. (2008). Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
  6. Alvermann, D. (2006). Struggling adolescent readers: A cultural construction. En A. McKeough (Ed.), Understanding literacy development: A global view (pp. 95-111). L. Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Baker, S., Bangeni, B., Burke, R., & Hunma, A. (2019). The invisibility of academic reading as social practice and its implications for equity in higher education: a scoping study. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1540554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1540554
  8. Bergey, B., Deacon, S. & Parrila, R. (2017). Metacognitive Reading and Study Strategies and Academic Achievement of University Students with and Without a History of Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415597020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415597020
  9. Bharuthram, S., & Clarence, S. (2015). Teaching academic reading as a disciplinary knowledge practice in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(2), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.20853/29-2-481
  10. Britt, M., Rouet, J., & Durik, A. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension. A Theory of Purposeful Reading. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682860
  11. Chevalier, T., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K., & Deacon, S. (2017). The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students with and Without a History of Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415588850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415588850
  12. Chin, M. (2019). Can L2 Less-proficient Adult Learners Become Skilled Readers? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(31), 1-10.
  13. Espinosa, A. (2020). Las estrategias de lectura y su incidencia en la comprensión lectora de estudiantes de una universidad pública del noroeste de México. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i21.689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i21.689
  14. Feller, D., Magliano, J., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., & Kopatich, R. (2020). Relations between Component Reading Skills, Inferences, and Comprehension Performance in Community College Readers. Discourse Processes, 57(5-6), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1759175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1759175
  15. Gavora, P., Vaculíková, J., Kalenda, J., Kálmán, O., Gombos, P., Świgost, M., & Bontová, A. (2020). Comparing metacognitive reading strategies among university students from Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1614545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1614545
  16. Guthrie, J., & Davis, M. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308203
  17. Hernández-Sampieri, R. & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mc Graw Hill Education
  18. Ivanic, R. (2004). Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write. Language and Education, 18(3), 221-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666877
  19. Kahu, E., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
  20. Kim, Y. (2017). Why the Simple View of Reading Is Not Simplistic: Unpacking Component Skills of Reading Using a Direct and Indirect Effect Model of Reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
  21. Kohart, J., & Larwin K. (2014). The Potential Impact of Structured Read-Aloud on Middle School Reading Achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 3(3), 187-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v3i3.6463
  22. Lastre, K. (2018). Efectos de la lectura en voz alta en la compresión lectora de estudiantes de primaria. Revista Encuentros, 16(01), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.15665/.v16i01.945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15665/.v16i01.945
  23. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
  24. Lee-Thompson, L. (2008). An Investigation of Reading Strategies Applied by American Learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Foreign Language Annals, 41(4), 702-721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03326.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03326.x
  25. Mann, S. (2000). The student’s experience of reading. Higher Education, 39(3), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003953002704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003953002704
  26. Muijselaar, M., Swart, N., Steenbeek-Planting, E., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & Jong, P. (2017). Developmental Relations Between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763
  27. Parodi, G., Burdiles, G., Moreno De León, T., & Julio, C. (2018). Hábitos lectores y géneros del discurso en filosofía y en economía y negocios: del discurso académico al discurso pro fesional. RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada, 56(2), 117-152. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832018000200117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832018000200117
  28. Reed, D., Swanson, E., Petscher, Y., & Vaughn, S. (2014). The effects of teacher read-alouds and student silent reading on predominantly bilingual high school seniors’ learning and retention of social studies content. Reading and Writing, 27(7), 1119–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9478-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9478-8
  29. Song, K., Na, B., & Kwon, H. (2020). A comprehensive review of research on reading comprehension strategies of learners reading in English-as-an-additional language. Educational Research Review, 29, 100308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100308
  30. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Uribe, G., & Camargo, Z. (2012). Prácticas de lectura y escritura académicas en la universidad colombiana. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 3(6), 317-341.
  32. Urzúa-Martínez, S., Riquelme, R., & Micin, S. (2021). Impacto de un programa de lectoescritura en el rendimiento académico de estudiantes de primer año universitario en Chile. Íkala, 26(2), 283-302. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8038371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n2a05

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.