Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

No. 38 (2021)
Continuous publication

Language pedagogy

Structural Complexity in Narrative Texts

Published 2021-08-17

  • Ligia Ochoa Sierra

Ligia Ochoa Sierra
Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Abstract

Storytelling is a textual sequence that appears transversally in the different school grades and cycles; however, no studies providing a set of criteria to determine its complexity, in order to adequately stagger the texts where this sequence prevails. In this quantitative research with a descriptive-interpretive design, the variables that establish the structural complexity inherent in 65 narrative school texts were investigated. To this end, the texts were analyzed based on 20 variables belonging to the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic levels. These texts were classified by linguistic experts into four levels of complexity. A statistical analysis was applied to answer the
central question: which linguistic variables and criteria determine the structural complexity of the corpus under analysis? The results show that the quantity and variety
factors with predominantly semantic and pragmatic variables enable to predict the complexity of the analyzed texts. These results enrich the theoretical discussion on the criteria that allow measuring the complexity of a text and can be an input for future research both in the field of applied linguistics and in education.

Keywords

text, storytelling , linguistics

PDF (Español)

References

  1. Adam, J. M. (1992). Les textes. Types et prototypes. Nathan.
  2. Aravena, S. & Hugo, E. (2016). Desarrollo de la complejidad sintáctica en textos narrativos y explicativos escritos por estudiantes secundarios. Lenguas Modernas, 47, 9-40. https://revistas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/45181/47238
  3. Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and Operationalising L2 Complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken y Vedder, I. (eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Investigating Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA (pp. 21-46). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  4. Combettes, B. (1983). Pour une grammaire textuelle. La progression thématique. DeBoeck-Duculot.
  5. Corriveau, K. H., Kurkul, K., & Arunachalam, S. (2016). Preschoolers' Preference for Syntactic Complexity Varies by Socioeconomic Status. Child Development, 87(5), 1529-1537. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fcdev.12553
  6. Dahl, Ö. (2008). Grammatical Resources and Linguistic Complexity: Sirionó as a Language without NP Coordination. In M. Miestamo, K.
  7. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 153-164). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.10dah
  8. De Clercq, B., & Housen, A. (2016). The Development of Morphological Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Study of L2 French and English. Second Language Research, 35(1), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0267658316674506
  9. Frantz, R., Starr, L., & Bailey, A. (2015). Syntactic Complexity as an Aspect of Text Complexity. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X15603980
  10. Kusters, W. (2008). Complexity in Linguistic Theory, Language Learning and Language Change. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson. (Eds.), Studies in Language Companion Series, n.° 94 (pp. 3-22). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  11. Lahuerta, A. (2017). Syntactic Complexity in Secondary-Level English Writing: Differences Among Writers Enrolled on Bilingual and Non-Bilingual Programmes. Porta Linguarum, 28, 67-80. http://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero28/5 Lahuerta.pdf
  12. Mancilla, R., Polat, N., & Akcay, A (2017). An Investigation of Native and Nonnative English Speakers' Levels of Written Syntactic Complexity in Asynchronous Online Discussions. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv012
  13. Maton, K., & Doran, J. (2017). Condensation: A Translation Device for Revealing Complexity of Knowledge Practices in Discourse, Part 2—Clausing and Sequencing. Onomázein, (número especial LSF y TCL sobre educación y conocimiento), 77-110. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.sfl.04
  14. Meneses, A., Ow, M., & Benítez, R. (2012). Complejidad sintáctica: ¿modalidad comunicativa o tipo textual? Estudio de casos de producciones textuales de estudiantes de 5.° básico. Onomázein, 25, 65-93. https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/8063
  15. Miestamo, M. (2017). Linguistic Diversity and Complexity. Lingue e Linguaggio, 16(2), 227-253. https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/matmies/publications/03_Miestamo_2017_2.pdf
  16. Nini, A. (2015). The Multidimensional Analysis Tagger [MAT, v. 1.3]. A Replication of Douglas Biber's Variation Across Speech and Writing Tagger. http://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger |
  17. Nippold, M., Frantz-Kaspar, M., & Vigeland, L. (2017). Spoken Language Production in Young Adults: Examining Syntactic Complexity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(5), 1339-1347. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-16-0124
  18. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
  19. Ochoa, L. (2016). Estudio sobre los niveles de dificultad de los textos que conforman las pruebas Saber 3°, 5° y 9° en el área de Lenguaje. ICFES. (Inédito).
  20. Ochoa, L. (2021). Complejidad estructural en textos escolares descriptivo-expositivos: estudio de corpus. Folios, 54, 91-110. https://doi.org/10.17227/folios.54-11977
  21. Ortega, L. (2015). Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing: Progress and Expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29(1), 82-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008
  22. Pallotti, G. (2015). A Simple View of Linguistic Complexity. Second Language Research, 31(1), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536435
  23. Peñaloza, C., Araya, C. & Coloma, C. (2017). Desarrollo de la complejidad sintáctica en recontados narrativos de niños preescolares y escolares. Logos, 27(2), 334-349. https://revistas.userena.cl/index.php/logos/article/view/949/1106
  24. Plakans, L., & Bilki, Z. (2016). Cohesion Features in ESL Reading: Comparing Beginning, Intermediate and Advanced Textbooks. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(1), 79-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.15443/RL2726
  25. Polio, C., & Yoon, H. (2018). The Reliability and Validity of Automated Tools for Examining Variation in Syntactic Complexity Across Genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 165-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12200
  26. Rescher, N. (1998). Complexity: A Philosophical Overview. Transaction Publishers.
  27. Schilk, M., & Schaub, S. (2016). Noun Phrase Complexity Across Varieties of English: Focus on Syntactic Function and Text Type. English World-Wide, 37(1), 58-85. http://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.1.03sch
  28. Sheehan, K., Flor, M., Napolitano, D. & Ramineni, Ch. (2015). Using TextEvaluator to Quantify Sources of Linguistic Complexity in Textbooks Targeted at First-Grade Readers Over the Past Half Century. ETS Research Report Series, 2, 1-17.
  29. Solnyshkina, M., Zamaletdinov, R., Gorodetskaya, L., & Gabitov, A. (2017). Evaluating Text Complexity and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 238-248. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1162266.pdf
  30. Text Ease and Readability Assesor [TERA]. http://129.219.222.70:8084/Coh-Metrix.aspx
  31. TextEvaluator (2017). About the TextEvaluator® Technology. https://textevaluator.ets.org/TextEvaluator/Docs/AboutTextEvaluator.pdf
  32. Van Silfhout, G., Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. (2015). Connectives as Processing Signals: How Students Benefit in Processing Narrative and Expository Texts. Discourse Processes, 52(1), 47-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.905237
  33. Vyatkina, N. (2013). Specific Syntactic Complexity: Developmental Profiling of Individuals Based on an Annotated Learner Corpus. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01421.x
  34. Werlich, E. (1975). Typologie der Texte. Quelle & Meyer.
  35. Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. (2015). Different Topics, Different Discourse: Relationships Among Writing Topic, Measures of Syntactic Complexity, And Judgments of Writing Quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.002

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.