Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé

v. 14 n. 36 (2023)
Investigación y pedagogía

Investigación y pedagogía

Perspectivas educativas e pesquisadora do pragmatismo em sociedades democráticas

https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v14.n36.2023.14769

Publicado 2023-08-04

  • Juan Sebastián Diago Camacho
    • ,
  • Pablo Páramo

Juan Sebastián Diago Camacho
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional

Pablo Páramo
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional

Resumo

O artigo apresenta os resultados de uma revisão sistemática de textos acadêmicos publicados entre 2012 e 2021, que integram os conceitos de pesquisa, educação e pragmatismo, no contexto das reflexões sobre democracia propostas por essa corrente de pensamento. O pragmatismo é entendido aqui como uma tradição filosófica, teórica e metodológica de origem estadunidense do final do século XIX, que relaciona a construção do saber com a experiência e a prática. Nesse contexto, busca-se responder à pergunta: "Como os conceitos de educação, pesquisa e pragmatismo se articulam na produção acadêmica contemporânea?". Assim, no desenvolvimento da revisão sistemática, foi realizada uma busca na base de dados científicos Scopus, a partir da qual mais de cinquenta publicações acadêmicas foram selecionadas e agrupadas em nove categorias diferentes, demonstrando a pluralidade e vitalidade do pragmatismo na pesquisa educacional contemporânea e permitindo visualizar suas abrangências e limitações para a educação e a pesquisa em sociedades democráticas.

Palavras-chave

pragmatismo, educação, pesquisa, democracia , revisão sistemática

PDF (Español) HTML (Español) EPUB (Español) XML (Español)

Referências

  1. Andersson, J., & Maivorsdotter, N. (2017). The ‘body pedagogics’ of an elite footballer’s career path–analysing Zlatan Ibrahimovic’s biography. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(5), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1268591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1268591
  2. Badley, G. F. (2015). Qualitative Ranting? Qualitative Inquiry, 21(9), 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415569791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415569791
  3. Barrena, S. (2014). El pragmatismo. Factótum, 12(1), 1–18.
  4. Brantefors, L. (2015). Between culture and cultural heritage: curriculum historical preconditions as constitutive for cultural relations – the Swedish case. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(2), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.994663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.994663
  5. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. RoutledgeFarmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496626
  6. Clarke, E., & Visser, J. (2019). Pragmatic research methodology in education: possibilities and pitfalls. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 42(5), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1524866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1524866
  7. Cutchin, M. P., Dickie, V. A., & Humphry, R. A. (2017). Foregrounding the transactional perspective’s community orientation. Journal of Occupational Science, 24(4), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1365750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2017.1365750
  8. Dall’Oglio, I., Vanzi, V., Tiozzo, E., Gawronski, O., Biagioli, V., Tucci, S., & Raponi, M. (2018). Five Years of Journal Clubs With Pediatric Nurses and Allied Health Professionals: A Retrospective Study and Satisfaction Survey. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 41, e2–e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.03.003
  9. Dalsgaard, C. (2020). Reflective mediation: Toward a sociocultural conception of situated reflection. Frontline Learning Research, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14786/FLR.V8I1.447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i1.447
  10. Devos, F., Foissac, F., Bouazza, N., Ancel, P.-Y., Tréluyer, J.-M., & Chappuy, H. (2019). Study characteristics impacted the pragmatism of randomized controlled trial published in nursing: a meta-epidemiological study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 116, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.07.017
  11. Dewey, J. (1995). Democracia y educación: una introducción a la filosofía de la educación. Ediciones Morata.
  12. Dodd, N., & Van Der Merwe, J. (2017). Over the rainbow: The role of academics in a “post-hope” South Africa. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 8(2–3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2017.086504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2017.10007364
  13. Dolgopolovas, V., Dagienė, V., Jasutė, E., & Jevsikova, T. (2019). Design science research for computational thinking in constructionist education: A pragmatist perspective [Informatinio mąstymo ugdymo konstrukcionistinėje aplinkoje projektavimo moksliniai tyrimai: Pragmatistinė perspektyva]. Problemos, 95, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.95.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.95.12
  14. Franco, S. (2016). A doctoral seminar in qualitative research methods: Lessons learned. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.28945/3564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3564
  15. Friedensen, R. E., & Kimball, E. (2018). The professoriate and the post-truth era: A historiographic analysis of expert judgment and the destabilization of objective truth [O professorado e a era da pós-verdade: Uma análise historiográfica do juizo de especialistas e a desestabilização da verdad]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3357
  16. Garbutt, M. (2016). Disciplinary kingdoms and the pursuit of pragmatism in research: A student perspective. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00561.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00561.x
  17. García-Vera, N. (2012). Project pedagogy at school: A revision of its philosophical and psychological foundations. La pedagogía de proyectos en la escuela: una revisión de sus fundamentos filosóficos y psicológicos. Magis, 4(9), 685–707.
  18. Gillin, N., & Smith, D. (2021). Filipino nurses’ perspectives of the clinical and language competency requirements for nursing registration in England: A qualitative exploration. Nurse Education in Practice, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103223
  19. Goetze, T. S. (2019). The Concept of a University: Theory, Practice, and Society. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300-05201001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300-05201001
  20. Gordon, M. (2016). Why Should Scholars Keep Coming Back to John Dewey? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(10), 1077–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1150800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1150800
  21. Grundy, S. (1997). Producto o praxis del currículo. Ediciones Morata.
  22. Hagström, E., & Lindberg, O. (2013). Three theses on teaching and learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.694097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.694097
  23. Honneth, A. (1999). La democracia como cooperación reflexiva. John Dewey y la teoría de la democracia del presente. Estudios Políticos, 15, 81–106. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.16677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.16677
  24. Hothersall, S. J. (2017). ‘Everyday knowledge’: A mixed-methods study using factor analysis and narrative approaches to explore social worker’s knowledge. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 19(2), 33–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v19i2.1071
  25. Houghton, C., Hunter, A., & Meskell, P. (2012). Linking aims, paradigm and method in nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.34.c9439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.34.c9439
  26. James, W. (1984). Pragmatismo. Altamira.
  27. Klaar, S., & Öhman, J. (2012). Action with friction: a transactional approach to toddlers’ physical meaning making of natural phenomena and processes in preschool. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(3), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2012.704765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2012.704765
  28. Klockner, K., Shields, P., Pillay, M., & Ames, K. (2021). Pragmatism as a teaching philosophy in the safety sciences: A higher education pedagogy perspective. Safety Science, 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105095
  29. Lake, R. (2017). On poetry, pragmatism and the urban possibility of creative democracy. Urban Geography, 38(4), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1272195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1272195
  30. Lamprecht, C., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Mixed methods in accounting: a field based analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(6), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2018-0403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2018-0403
  31. Liszka, J. (2013). Charles Peirce’s Rhetoric and the Pedagogy of Active Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(7), 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00763.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00763.x
  32. Lundegård, I., & Wickman, P.-O. (2012). It takes two to tango:Studying how students constitute political subjects in discourses on sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.590895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.590895
  33. Maguire, K., & Gibbs, P. (2013). Exploring the notion of quality in quality higher education assessment in a collaborative future. Quality in Higher Education, 19(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2013.774220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2013.774220
  34. Manglos-Weber, N., & Avelis, J. (2019). Expanding the Reflexive Space: Resilient Young Adults, Institutional Cultures, and Cognitive Schemas. Sociological Forum, 34(3), 664–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12519
  35. Mendes, D., & Betti, M. (2017). Practicum in physical education school as “living thing”: A perspective from semiotics and Charles S. Peirce’s pragmatism [O estágio na licenciatura em educação física como “coisa viva”: Uma perspectiva a partir da semiótica e do pragmaticismo de Charles . Movimento, 23(4), 1245–1256. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.71897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.71897
  36. Meng, Q. (2019). Genesis and undertaker of ‘quantification of social class’: On the technocrats in the early stage of the Chinese Communist Party’s land revolution. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 5(1), 99–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X18811798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X18811798
  37. Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65(4), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2
  38. Morrison, R. (2016). Pragmatist Epistemology and Jane Addams: Fundamental Concepts for the Social Paradigm of Occupational Therapy. Occupational Therapy International, 23(4), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1430
  39. Newton, P., Da Silva, A., & Berry, S. (2020). The Case for Pragmatic Evidence-Based Higher Education: A Useful Way Forward? Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.583157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.583157
  40. Nijhawan, S. (2017). Bridging the gap between theory and practice with design-based action research. Studia Paedagogica, 22(4), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2017-4-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2017-4-2
  41. Nyberg, J. (2016). You are Seldom Born with a Drum Kit in Your Hands: Music Teachers’ Conceptualizations of Knowledge and Learning Within Music Education as an Assessment Practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 29(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9362-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9362-3
  42. Ohlsson, S. (2013). Beyond evidence-based belief formation: How normative ideas have constrained conceptual change research. Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v1i2.58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v1i2.58
  43. Ormerod, R. (2020). Pragmatism in professional practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2739
  44. Páramo, P. (2009). Pedagogía Urbana: elementos para su delimitación como campo de conocimiento. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/01203916.7586
  45. Páramo, P. (2019). Pragmatismo en el diseño de prácticas culturales de convivencia ciudadana. En P. Páramo & A. Burbano (Eds.), Convivencia Ciudadana en ciudades latinoamericanas (pp. 241–248). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional; Universidad de la República Uruguay. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/ecp.2019.3526
  46. Páramo, P. (2020). Cómo elaborar una revisión sistemática. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31465.85608
  47. Pham, K. T. (2021). The Concept of Pragmatism and Its Impact on Education in the Vietnamese Context. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(4), 1453–1466. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006858
  48. Poradzisz, M., & Florczak, K. (2019). Collaboration: Does It Require Pragmatic Thought? Nursing Science Quarterly, 32(4), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318419864336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318419864336
  49. Decreto 1860/1994, reglamentación parcial de la Ley 115 de 1994, en los aspectos pedagógicos y organizativos generales. (1994). https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-172061_archivo_pdf_decreto1860_94.pdf
  50. Rasmussen, L. J., Østergaard, L. D., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2019). Creativity as a developmental resource in sport training activities. Sport, Education and Society, 24(5), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1403895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1403895
  51. Rorty, R. (2000). El pragmatismo, una versión: Antiautoritarismo en epistemología y ética. Editorial Ariel.
  52. Roth, W. M. (2015). Meaning and the real life of language-Learning from “pathological” cases in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 30, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.03.010
  53. Schubert, C. (2015). Situating technological and societal futures: Pragmatist engagements with computer simulations and social dynamics. Technology in Society, 40, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.07.003
  54. Shannon, J., Hankins, K., Shelton, T., Bosse, A., Scott, D., Block, D., Fischer, H., Eaves, L., Jung, J.-K., Robinson, J., Rees, A., & Nicolas, A. (2021). Community geography: Toward a disciplinary framework. Progress in Human Geography, 45(5), 1147–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520961468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520961468
  55. Sommer, A. (2016). Are you afraid of the dark? Notes on the psychology of belief in histories of science and the occult* [Avez-vous peur du noir ? Notes sur la psychologie de la croyance dans l’histoire de la science et l’histoire de l’occulte]. En. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 18(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2016.1170062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2016.1170062
  56. Thoilliez, B. (2013). Implicaciones pedagógicas del pragmatismo filosófico americano: una reconsideración de las aportaciones educativas de Charles S. Peirce, William James y John Dewey. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  57. Van Poeck, K. (2019). Environmental and sustainability education in a post-truth era. An exploration of epistemology and didactics beyond the objectivism-relativism dualism. Environmental Education Research, 25(4), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1496404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1496404
  58. Van Poeck, K., Östman, L., & Block, T. (2020). Opening up the black box of learning-by-doing in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.12.006
  59. Von Hausswolff, K. (2021). Practical thinking while learning to program–novices’ experiences and hands-on encounters. Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1953295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1953295
  60. Williams, R., & Du Bois, W. (2012). “The Sacred Unity in All the Diversity”: The Text and a Thematic Analysis of W.E.B. Du Bois’ “The Individual and Social Conscience” (1905). Journal of African American Studies, 16(3), 456–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-011-9171-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-011-9171-4
  61. Wolnicki, M. (2012). Restoring pragmatism in American governance. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(7), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068291211231678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068291211231678
  62. Zambas, S., Smythe, E., & Koziol-Mclain, J. (2015). Hermeneutics and pragmatism offer a way of exploring the consequences of advanced assessment. Nursing Philosophy, 16(4), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12094
  63. Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2020). Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.