Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Didactics and communication. habermas’ contributions to education

Abstract

This article aims at establishing the possible bridges, agreements, or disagreements between the Theory of Communicative Action (TCA) and didactics. It emphasizes on the necessary relationship between didactics and debates on the function, goals, and nature of education itself. For this purpose it is firstly presented the relationship between communication and education, then the TCA’s basic elements related to didactics, finally, as a conclusion, some agreements and disagreements between the TCA and didactics are formulated. The frame of this work is the discussion about the role that a critical theory can play when analyzing the sense of education and its practice.

Keywords

Theory of Communicative Action, communication, education, didactics.

PDF (Español) HTML (Español)

References

  1. Adorno, t. & HorkHeimer, m. (2007). Dialéctica de la ilustración. Madrid: Akal.
  2. Carr, W. (2002). Una teoría para la educación. Hacia una investigación educativa crítica. Madrid: Morata.
  3. Carr, W. (2007). 'Educational research as a practical science'. International Journal of Research & Method in Education [30, 3, 271-286]. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701614774
  4. DurkHeim, e. (1950). Educación y sociología. Madrid: Editorial de La Lectura.
  5. GicHeol, H. (2002). 'An Educational Interpretation of Jürgen Habermas's Communicative Rationality'. [3, 2, 149-159].
  6. Habermas, J. (1973). 'Conocimiento e interés'. HOYOS, G. [Trad.] Ideas y Valores [42-45, 61-76].
  7. Habermas, J. (1984). 'Intención, convención e interacción lingüística'. Teoría de la acción comunicativa: complementos y estudios previos. Madrid: Cátedra.
  8. Habermas, J. (2010). Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Madrid: Trotta.
  9. Hoyos, G. (1990). [Prólogo]. Díaz, m. & mu-oz, J. A. [Ed.] Pedagogía, discurso y poder. Bogotá: CORPRODIC.
  10. HorkHeimer, M. (2000). Teoría tradicional y teoría crítica. Barcelona: Paidós.
  11. Huttunen, r. & murpHy, m. (2012). 'Discourse and Recognition as Normative Grounds for Radical Pedagogy: Habermasian and Honnethian Ethics in the Context of Education'. Stud Philos Educ [31, 137-152]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9285-8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.