Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 15 Núm. 40 (2024)
Investigación y pedagogía

Investigación y pedagogía

La Retroalimentación en la Educación Superior del Siglo XXI

https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.22160159.v15.n40.2024.17823

Publicado 2024-07-02

  • Gustavo Adolfo Cárdenas Messa
    • ,
  • Fabio Nelson Giraldo Arcila
    • ,
  • Martha Cecilia Giraldo Montoya
    • ,
  • Armando Zambrano Leal
    • ,
  • Dayaris Jheliksa Ropero Casiano
    • ,
  • Luisa María Sánchez Díaz

Gustavo Adolfo Cárdenas Messa
Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Fabio Nelson Giraldo Arcila
Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Martha Cecilia Giraldo Montoya
Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Armando Zambrano Leal
Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Dayaris Jheliksa Ropero Casiano
Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Luisa María Sánchez Díaz
Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Resumen

Este artículo presenta los resultados de una investigación de análisis documental sobre el uso de la retroalimentación en la Educación Superior. La metodología utilizada para la revisión, sistematización y análisis documental fue la “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” [Artículo Preferido de Informes de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis]. Se analizaron artículos de investigaciones publicados entre 2014 y 2023, extraídos de Scopus. El campo geográfico seleccionado para la recolección de las publicaciones fue Europa, debido a su amplia investigación sobre la retroalimentación, lo que resulta relevante para el contexto educativo de países como el nuestro. Se examinó la perspectiva y los métodos utilizados por los países europeos para mejorar el aprendizaje de los estudiantes a través de la retroalimentación. Entre las principales conclusiones se encuentran la valoración positiva de la retroalimentación en la educación superior, la necesidad de promover la formulación y hacer seguimiento de planes de aprendizaje en los estudiantes para incentivar el compromiso con su propio proceso formativo y mejorar su autopercepción. No obstante, esto requiere formar a los docentes de las diferentes disciplinas en prácticas efectivas de evaluación y retroalimentación.

Palabras clave

autoevaluación, evaluación, retroalimentación, educación superior, aprendizaje, enseñanza

PDF HTML EPUB

Citas

  1. Agricola, B., Prins, F. & Sluijsmans, D. (2019). Impact of feedback request forms and verbal feedback on higher education students’ feedback perception, self-efficacy, and motivation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 0(00), 6-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1688764
  2. Arriagada, C., Venegas, N. & Calzadilla, Ó. (2021). La evaluación de las prácticas profesionales de coenseñanza. Praxis y Saber, 12(31), 2-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v12.n31.2021.10795
  3. Bánhidi, M., & Lacza, G. (2020). Lifestyle changes during Covid-19 period in Hungary – feedback of university students. World Leisure Journal, 62(4), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2020.1825251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2020.1825251
  4. Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Ginkel, S. v., Macfadyen, L. P. & Biemans, H. J. (2021). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review 37, 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489
  5. Barth, R. S. (2002). Learning by heart. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Belash, Y., Muravyev, A., Ryzhov, G. & Chirkova, A. (2018). Receiving Feedback from Young Specialists –University Graduates. LETI, 102 104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PTES.2018.8604256
  7. Cacciamani, S., Perrucci, V. & Iannaccone, A. (2018). Il peer feedback in un corso universitario blended: costruzione di uno schema di codifica. QUERTY 13(2), 32-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000003
  8. Cheng, X. & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Sustaining university english as a foreign language learners’ writing performance through provision of comprehensive written corrective feedback. Sustainability 18, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158192
  9. Clayton Bernard, R. & Kermarrec, G. (2022). Peer assessment and video feedback for fostering self, co, and shared regulation of learning in a higher education language classroom. Frontiers in Education 7, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.732094
  10. Costelloe, L. & Egan, A. (2020). “Because, as a teacher, giving feedback and assessment is actually really difficult”: using self- and peer assessment to develop Higher Education teachers’ skills in assessment and feedback. 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (pp. 501-505). Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd20.2020.11096
  11. Cronin, A. & Meehan, M. (2021). The utility of mathematics support centre feedback to lecturers of large first-year university mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 52(10), 1471-1490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1769757
  12. Dijks, M., Brummer, L. & Kostons, D. (2018). The anonymous reviewer: the relationship between perceived expertise and the perceptions of peer feedback in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8), 1258-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1447645
  13. Dingyloudi, F. & Strijbos, J. W. (2018). Just plain peers across social networks: Peer-feedback networks nested in personal and academic networks in higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 18, 86-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.02.002
  14. Egelandsdal, K. & Krumsvik, R. J. (2019). Clicker Interventions at University Lectures and the Feedback Gap. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 14(1-2), 70-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2019-01-02-06
  15. Evgeniya, S., Maksym, V., Yulia, T. & Оlesya, K. (2016). Monitoring of Efficiency of Feedback Systems Use on the Base of Kherson State University. ICTERI.
  16. Flodén, J. (2017). The impact of student feedback on teaching in Higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(7), 1054-1068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1224997
  17. Forster, M., Weiser, C. & Maur, A. (2018). How feedback provided by voluntary electronic quizzes affects learning outcomes of university students in large classes. Computers & Education 121(2), 100-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.012
  18. Fraile, J., Ruiz-Bravo, P., Orgaz-Rincón, D. & Zamorano-Sande, D. (2021). Evaluación formativa, autorregulación, feedback y herramientas digitales: uso de Socrative en educación. Retos 42, 724-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.87067
  19. González Rodríguez, L. M. & Álvarez Mosquero, P. (2020). The impact of feedback and explicit rhetorical instruction on EFL students’ writing proficiency in higher education. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 42(1), 120-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2020-42.1.07
  20. Gros Salvat, B. & Cano García, E. (2021). Procesos de feedback para fomentar la autorregulación con soporte tecnológico en la educación superior: Revisión sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia 24(2), 107-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28886
  21. Harangi-Rákos, M., Stefanescu, D., Zsido, K.-E. & Fenyves, V. (2022). Thrown into Deep Water: Feedback on Student Satisfaction—A Case Study in Hungarian and Romanian Universities. Education sciences 12(1), 2-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010036
  22. Hernández Rivero, V. M., Santana Bonilla, P. J. & y Sosa Alonso, J. J. (2021). Feedback y autorregulación del aprendizaje en educación superior. Revista de Investigacion Educativa 39(1), 227-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.423341
  23. Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van den Broek, P. & Driel, J. v. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analyisis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44(6), 863-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
  24. Ion, G., Cano-García, E. & Fernández-Ferrer, M. (2017). Enhancing self-regulated learning through using written feedback in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research 85, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.06.002
  25. Jørgensen, B. M. (2018). Investigating non-engagement with feedback in higher education as a social practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44(4), 623-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1525691
  26. Klimova, B. & Pikhart, M. (2022). Application of corrective feedback using emerging technologies among L2 university students. Cogent education 9, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2132681
  27. Knauf, H. (2015). Reading, listening and feeling: audio feedback as a component of an inclusive learning culture at universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41(3), 442-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1021664
  28. Lachner, A., Burkhart, C. & Nückles, M. (2017). Formative computer-based feedback in the university classroom: Specific concept maps scaffold students’ writing. Computers in Human Behavior 72, 459-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.008
  29. Langewitz, W., Dantas Seixas, U. P., Hunziker, S., Becker, C., Fischer, M., Benz, A. & Otto, B. (2021). Doctor-patient communication during the corona crisis web-based interactions and structured feedback from standardized patient at the University of Basel and the LMU Munich. GMZ Journal for Medical Education 38(4), 1-19.
  30. Leenknecht, M., Hompus, P. & van der Schaaf, M. (2019). Feedback seeking behaviour in higher education: the association with students’ goal orientation and deep learning approach. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44(7), 1069-1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1571161
  31. Lipsch, I. & Kim, D. (2022). A case study of the use of the Hattie and Timperley feedback model on written feedback in thesis examination in higher education. Cogent Education 9(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082089
  32. Lutovac, S., Kaasil, R., Komulainen, J. & Maikkola, M. (2017). University lecturers’ emotional responses to and coping with student feedback: a finnish case study. European Journal of Psychology of Education 32(2), 235-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0301-1
  33. Maes, O., Van Nieuwenhoven, C. & Colognesi, S. (2022). The feedback given by university supervisors to student teachers during their co-assessment meetings. Frontiers in Education (7), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.848547
  34. Mauri, T., Ginesta, A. & Rochera, M.-J. (2014). The use of feedback systems to improve collaborative text writing: a proposal for the higher education context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 53(4), 411-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.961503
  35. Montalbetti, K. & Orizio, E. (2022). Innovare la didattica universitaria fra vincoli e opportunità. Un’esperienza di peer feedback. Qwerty 17(1), 45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000050
  36. Murillo-Zamorano, L. R. & Montanero, M. (2017). Oral presentations in higher education: a comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(1), 138-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1303032
  37. O’Neill, G., McEvoy, E. & Maguire, T. (2020). Developing a national understanding of assessment and feedback in irish higher education. Irish Educational Studies 39(4), 490-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2020.1730220
  38. Panadero, E., García Pérez, D., Fernández Ruíz, J., Fraile, J., SánchezIglesias, I. & Brown, G. (2022). University students’ strategies and criteria during self-assessment: instructor’s feedback, rubrics, and year level effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education 38, 1-21.
  39. Pastore, S., Manuti, A., Scardigno, F., Curci, A. & Pentassuglia, M. (2019). Students’ feedback in mid-term surveys: an explorative contribution in the Italian university context. Quality in Higher Education 25(1), 21-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2019.1594620
  40. Pentassuglia, M. (2017). Inside the ‘body box’: exploring feedback in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(5), 683-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1396442
  41. Pereira, D., Flores, M., Veiga Simão, A. & Barros, A. (2016). Effectiveness and relevance of feedback in Higher Education: A study of undergraduate students. Studies in Educational Evaluation 49, 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.004
  42. Portillo Vidiella, M. C. & Cano García, E. (2015). Regulating the writing process in the teacher training practicum guided by feedback at the University of Barcelona. Cambridge Journal of Education 46(1), 55-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1011083
  43. Rasi, P. & Vuojari, H. (2018). Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 49(2), 292-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12587
  44. Remesal, A., Colomina, R. M., Mauri, T. & Rochera, J. M. (2017). Uso de cuestionarios online con feedback automático para la e-innovación en el alumnado universitario. Comunicar 51, 51-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-05
  45. Rochera, M., Enge, A. & Coll, C. (2021). The effects of teacher’ feedback: a case study of an online discussion forum in Higher Education. Revista de Educación a Distancia 21(67), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/red.476901
  46. Roux, D., Meyerc, G., Cymbalista, F., Bouaziz, J., Falgaronee, G., Tesniere, A., Gervais, J., Cariou, A., Peffault de Lattour, R, Marat, M., Moenaert, E., Guebli, T., Rodríguez, O., Lefort, A., Dreyfuss, D., Hajague, D. &Ricard, J. (2016). Computerized ranking test in three French universities: Staff experience and students’ feedback. Revue de Medecine Interne 37, 166-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2015.12.026
  47. Ruohoniemi, M., Forni, M., Mikkonen, J. & Parpala, A. (2017). Enhancing quality with a research-based student feedback instrument: a comparison of veterinary students’ learning experiences in two culturally different European universities. Quality in Higher Education 23(3), 249-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2017.1407401
  48. Sánchez-Martí, A., Muñoz Moreno, J. L. & Ion, G. (2019). Diseño y validación de un cuestionario de percepción del aprendizaje a través del feedback entre iguales en educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluacion Psicologica 53(4), 113-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP53.4.09
  49. Simonsmeier, B. A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M. & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer feedback improves students’ academic self-concept in higher education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09591-y
  50. Spivakovska, E., Vinnyk, M., Tarasich, Y., & Kuchma, O. (2016). Monitoring of Efficiency of Feedback Systems Use on the Base of Kherson State University. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications.Higher Education 61, 706-724.
  51. Tautz, D., Sprenger, D. A. & Schwaninger, A. S. (2021). Evaluation of four digital tools and their perceived impact on active learning, repetition and feedback in a large university class. Computers and Education 175, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104338
  52. Thangaraj, J., Ward, M. & O’Riordan, F. (2022). Use of assessment and feedback systems for introductory computer programming modules of higher education: a comparative study. 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances, (pp. 127-134). Valencia: Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd22.2022.14660
  53. Theobald, M. & Bellhaauser, H. (2022). How am I going and where to next? Elaborated online feedback improves university students’ self-regulated learning and performance. Internet and Higher Education 55, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100872
  54. Thi Thai, N., De Wever, B. & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education 107, 113-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
  55. Valtins, K. & Muravoca, N. (2019). Intelligent feedback systems in higher education - Why and how? The 15th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, (pp. 125-132). Bucarest. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026X-19-154
  56. van Klaveren, C., Kooiman, K., Cornelisz, I. & Meeter, M. (2018). The higher education enrollment decision:feedback on expected study success and updating behavior. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 12(1), 67-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2018.1496501
  57. van Meenen, F., Masson, N., Catrysse, L. & Coertjens, L. (2023). Taking a closer look at how higher education students process and use (discrepant) peer feedback. Learning and Instruction 84, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101711
  58. Wu, X. M., Dixon, H. R. & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Sustainable development of students’ learning capabilities: The case of university students’ attitudes towards teachers, peers, and themselves as oral feedback sources in Learning English. Sustainability 13(9), 1-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095211

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.