Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé

v. 13 n. 32 (2022)
Desafios e oportunidades para a investigação em Educação Musical

Investigación y pedagogía

Estratégias de leitura e desempenho acadêmico na transição para a educação superior

https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v13.n32.2022.12809

Publicado 2022-01-01

  • Yudi Herrera-Nuñez
    • ,
  • Bianca Dapelo, Dra.

Yudi Herrera-Nuñez
Universidad de Playa Ancha

Bianca Dapelo, Dra.
Universidad de Viña del Mar

Resumo

A transição para a universidade é um processo de adaptação muito complexo que desafia as instituições a conceberem mecanismos para promover a assistência a longo prazo dos estudantes até a sua graduação. Esta pesquisa visa contribuir para a compreensão do uso de
estratégias de leitura e sua relação com o sucesso acadêmico dos estudantes durante a transição para a educação superior. A metodologia é quantitativa, com uma amostra não probabilística intencional de 145 voluntários: estudantes de ensino médio de escolas com um alto índice de
vulnerabilidade e estudantes de uma universidade pública da Região de Valparaíso no Chile, através da implementação de um instrumento. Entre os principais resultados, pode-se observar
que os grupos de estudantes de ensino médio e universitário diferem significativamente no tipo e no uso de estratégias de leitura, as quais estão direta e significativamente correlacionadas com
o desempenho acadêmico e são relevantes porque o uso de estratégias diferentes afeta o nível de leitura dos estudantes com baixo desempenho acadêmico, especialmente no ensino médio.

Palavras-chave

estratégias de leitura, desempenho acadêmico, transição educacional, literacia acadêmica

PDF (Español) HTML (Español) EPUB (Español) XML (Español)

Biografia do Autor

Bianca Dapelo, Dra.

Psicóloga, Ha trabajado dirigiendo y desarrollando proyectos de nivelación educativa y Talento.

Referências

  1. Afflerbach, P. (1990). The Influence of Prior Knowledge and Text Genre on Readers’ Prediction Strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969009547700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969009547700
  2. Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. (2014). Identifying and Describing Constructively Responsive Comprehension Strategies in New and Traditional Forms of Reading. (2014). En S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension (pp. 93-114). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759609-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759609-15
  3. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., & Kim, J. (2015). Conceptualizing and Assessing Higher-Order Thinking in Reading. Theory Into Practice, 54(3), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367
  4. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B., Kim, J., Crassas, M., & Doyle, B. (2013). Reading: What Else Matters Besides Strategies and Skills? The Reading Teacher, 66(6), 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1146
  5. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P., & Paris, S. (2008). Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
  6. Alvermann, D. (2006). Struggling adolescent readers: A cultural construction. En A. McKeough (Ed.), Understanding literacy development: A global view (pp. 95-111). L. Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Baker, S., Bangeni, B., Burke, R., & Hunma, A. (2019). The invisibility of academic reading as social practice and its implications for equity in higher education: a scoping study. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1540554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1540554
  8. Bergey, B., Deacon, S. & Parrila, R. (2017). Metacognitive Reading and Study Strategies and Academic Achievement of University Students with and Without a History of Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415597020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415597020
  9. Bharuthram, S., & Clarence, S. (2015). Teaching academic reading as a disciplinary knowledge practice in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(2), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.20853/29-2-481
  10. Britt, M., Rouet, J., & Durik, A. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension. A Theory of Purposeful Reading. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682860
  11. Chevalier, T., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K., & Deacon, S. (2017). The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students with and Without a History of Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415588850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415588850
  12. Chin, M. (2019). Can L2 Less-proficient Adult Learners Become Skilled Readers? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(31), 1-10.
  13. Espinosa, A. (2020). Las estrategias de lectura y su incidencia en la comprensión lectora de estudiantes de una universidad pública del noroeste de México. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i21.689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i21.689
  14. Feller, D., Magliano, J., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., & Kopatich, R. (2020). Relations between Component Reading Skills, Inferences, and Comprehension Performance in Community College Readers. Discourse Processes, 57(5-6), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1759175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1759175
  15. Gavora, P., Vaculíková, J., Kalenda, J., Kálmán, O., Gombos, P., Świgost, M., & Bontová, A. (2020). Comparing metacognitive reading strategies among university students from Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1614545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1614545
  16. Guthrie, J., & Davis, M. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308203
  17. Hernández-Sampieri, R. & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mc Graw Hill Education
  18. Ivanic, R. (2004). Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write. Language and Education, 18(3), 221-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666877
  19. Kahu, E., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
  20. Kim, Y. (2017). Why the Simple View of Reading Is Not Simplistic: Unpacking Component Skills of Reading Using a Direct and Indirect Effect Model of Reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
  21. Kohart, J., & Larwin K. (2014). The Potential Impact of Structured Read-Aloud on Middle School Reading Achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 3(3), 187-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v3i3.6463
  22. Lastre, K. (2018). Efectos de la lectura en voz alta en la compresión lectora de estudiantes de primaria. Revista Encuentros, 16(01), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.15665/.v16i01.945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15665/.v16i01.945
  23. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
  24. Lee-Thompson, L. (2008). An Investigation of Reading Strategies Applied by American Learners of Chinese as a Foreign Language. Foreign Language Annals, 41(4), 702-721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03326.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03326.x
  25. Mann, S. (2000). The student’s experience of reading. Higher Education, 39(3), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003953002704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003953002704
  26. Muijselaar, M., Swart, N., Steenbeek-Planting, E., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & Jong, P. (2017). Developmental Relations Between Reading Comprehension and Reading Strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763
  27. Parodi, G., Burdiles, G., Moreno De León, T., & Julio, C. (2018). Hábitos lectores y géneros del discurso en filosofía y en economía y negocios: del discurso académico al discurso pro fesional. RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada, 56(2), 117-152. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832018000200117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832018000200117
  28. Reed, D., Swanson, E., Petscher, Y., & Vaughn, S. (2014). The effects of teacher read-alouds and student silent reading on predominantly bilingual high school seniors’ learning and retention of social studies content. Reading and Writing, 27(7), 1119–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9478-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9478-8
  29. Song, K., Na, B., & Kwon, H. (2020). A comprehensive review of research on reading comprehension strategies of learners reading in English-as-an-additional language. Educational Research Review, 29, 100308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100308
  30. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Uribe, G., & Camargo, Z. (2012). Prácticas de lectura y escritura académicas en la universidad colombiana. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 3(6), 317-341.
  32. Urzúa-Martínez, S., Riquelme, R., & Micin, S. (2021). Impacto de un programa de lectoescritura en el rendimiento académico de estudiantes de primer año universitario en Chile. Íkala, 26(2), 283-302. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8038371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v26n2a05

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.